In regards to my numerous posts about Ted Haggard (drug-abusing adulterer):
Statement A:
"Tofu, you are just trying to ruin a father of 5 all in the name of politics" - Ruth the Meanie
Statement B:
"Ted Haggard ruined him self, he cheated on his wife and then lied to the 30 million people of his church and all those who read his books. But...God will forgive him if he repents." - Tofu Jesus
Was this question fair and balanced?
2006-11-03 08:53:37 · 21 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not fair or balanced because you added the (drug/adulterer part).
I'd say B.
But, I wasn't aware that this guy had been convicted of anything in a court of law. And as an adult, a gay relationship with another adult man....it's just not any of my business. Nor yours.
2006-11-03 08:57:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry Tofu but Old original Blue Jesus said Haggard was filled with all unrighteousness and has pleasure with those that do the same things he does.
So I'm thinking you can check his social calender and get a list of Gay reciprocaters.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-03 09:06:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I partly agree :) this is generally how I start up, yet now and lower back I ought to push by writing a component - basically poorly attempting to stay the story, be the characters, etc. and then once I edit, i myself get into the story extra desirable. Or now and lower back, even once I've written a component residing the story & being the characters, i'm going to circulate lower back and do it lower back once I edit here couple of drafts. however the later drafts after those - actually extra enhancing and viewing my artwork extra because of the fact the reader. BQ - What has been the main memorable question you have ever considered in this internet site? --Blue Tiger's going away question.
2016-11-27 01:39:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither really. I don't think you're trying to personally destroy a political "family man" for the sake of your affiliation, and I also don't think that he has completely ruined himself and is in need of some sort of repentance. He's made some big mistakes, and the acknowledgment of that is about as far as anyone on the outside can rightfully go.
2006-11-03 09:02:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait--you forgot about his desire to be able to snort his meth in the presence of 5 or 6 18--22 year old males???
The president preacher!! Good Grief!! Can't wait to hear the Republickend response to this one---This guy stumped for many a candidate and factored in on much of the Anti-Gay legislation that is unnecessarily shoved in our faces by these nut-jobs!!
Hallelulah!!
2006-11-03 09:01:53 · answer #5 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought we were still living in the US. Isn't the idea of innocent until proven guilty still in affect? Perhaps, we should just all calm down and let reality set in. There is so much partisanship here that one can hardly get any real information.
2006-11-03 08:57:49 · answer #6 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How about Statement C: "Tofu, an accusation has been made, but all the facts are not in. Hold your horses, and your judgmental attitude until we know more about this."
2006-11-03 08:57:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about statement C There is enough evidence to launch a full scale investigation and until the results are in we should suspend judgment.
Sorry I forgot innocent until proven guilty only applies to Dems.
2006-11-03 08:58:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
b except for the Tofu jesus part
2006-11-03 08:54:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I say B.....But it still makes me upset that he would do such a thing, God can forgive anything, its just me having trouble forgiving this man....
2006-11-03 18:15:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋