2006-11-03 08:13:15 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For the record, the definition of impeachment is defined as charging a public official before a competent tribunal with misconduct in office.
2006-11-10 06:47:21 · update #1
Yes, he lied about the reasons to go into war which has caused the deaths of people he is sworn to protect. If Clinton could be impeached for lying about his private sex life, then Bush can be impeached for some far more sinister.
2006-11-03 08:16:39 · answer #1 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not just the President but the entire U.S. Congress as well for allowing the states to be invaded.
In the Constitution, it is specifically stated that the federal government shall protect the states from invasion.
2006-11-03 16:44:36 · answer #2 · answered by mikey 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not saying he should be impeached but he lied to the whole country and isn't making good choices in Iraq. He should change some of his ways then I'd like him a lot more.
2006-11-03 16:18:59 · answer #3 · answered by tictac_lvr 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This must be the question of the week, because Ive seen so many times I lost count!
And No, President Bush shouldnt be impeached, he hasnt commited any crimes.
2006-11-03 16:18:00 · answer #4 · answered by Katz 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That term has been tossed around by Howard Dean, Russ Feingold, John Conyers, and others, but there is little to suggest that President Bush has broken any laws. It has been politically expedient to keep pounding that, but if you press any Democrats on the subject, you won't find anyone who thinks he should be brought up on Articles of Impeachment.
2006-11-03 16:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by united9198 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. I hate to see any president impeached.
The "Americans" who want the president impeached for the war in Iraq are stupid, uneducated and should be stuck in Iraq.
Wait! Did I make a joke?
2006-11-03 16:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by nbasuperdupe 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
No. He did not break any laws. That is the only real reason for a president of the US to be impeached.
2006-11-03 16:14:43 · answer #7 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What I don't have in hand is the 15 or so counts that legal scholars say are Dumbya "high crimes and misdemeanors".
Google is easy, still uncencored and democratic to find them.
2006-11-03 16:19:44 · answer #8 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Only those President that break our current laws should be impeached. Bush hasn't broken any laws. You might not like him and don't like what he is doing but he hasn't broken any laws.
2006-11-03 16:16:44 · answer #9 · answered by Texan 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
YES,, for allowing the invasion of this country by another country (Mexico) and the treasonous act of collusion with said enemy in the planned merger of the counties without Congresses authorization.
2006-11-03 16:19:33 · answer #10 · answered by neil r 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋