This is an inecuation.x is the term that you don't know from the inecuation,and you probably have to find the values of x,don't you?You can make a sistem...and calculate x.Besides,the inecuation is inccorect.It should have been 27x less than 92+x less than 850.This form is the only one correct,and the only one with solutions.How old are you?Have you studied math with inecuations?I learnt about these things in math,in algebra.I hope you understand my method.You can writte a sistem with:the Ist ecuation:27x less than 92+x,and under it,you writte 92+x less than 850.
then,you writte again 27x less than 92 +x and under it..x less than 850-92,because you take the same terms in the right side,with,in case of 92,a different sign,minus.
2006-11-03 06:50:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ana 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
As it's written, there is no solution. First, examine the individual statements:
27x < 92 + x
850 < 92 + x
We do not know the relationship between 27x and 850 yet.
From the first statement, we know that:
27x < 92 + x
26x < 92
x < 92/26
x < 46/13 (approximately 3.5)
From the second statement, we know that:
92 + x > 850
x > 758
So, x must be less than 3.5 and simultaneously greater than 758.
There is no x that fulfills that criteria.
2006-11-03 06:57:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rev Kev 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
x > 758
26x < 92
not possible
If 27x < 92 + x < 850 then x < 92/26
2006-11-03 07:03:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Helmut 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seems the question havnt been written correctly.
Even then it means that
92+x > 27x but
92+x < 850
2006-11-03 06:57:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by MY Regards to All 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
27x < 92 + x > 850
92 + x > 850
x>758
27x < 92 + x
26x<92
x<3.54
There is no valid range for x.
2006-11-03 07:04:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pi
2006-11-03 06:51:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
X is mutant
2006-11-03 06:51:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by MUTANT 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
k
2006-11-03 06:51:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jennifer M 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
not possible
2006-11-03 06:51:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh, no
2006-11-03 06:54:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vladimir S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋