Ind
2006-11-03 06:29:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by butterflykisses427 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
very few would desire to have examine this questions and extremely few replied it nonetheless i'm additionally between them a citizen of usa earlier an Indian as we can't stay a citizen of two international places with the aid of fact being American resident we're not to any extent further Indian yet we are able to bypass to our mom land for ever and are unfastened to stay there too loosing all reward if we live longer i think of , each physique loves peace and hate a place the place there is not any protection . once I see terrorism is a worldwide subject each physique could play his or her place . whilst Malala a muslim lady can combat for guidance of ladies ,whilst a new child needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and not unfastened from its effects ,an afternoon would come whilst human beings would come forward to wipe it from human minds in spite of the incontrovertible fact that that's in basic terms too late already , there are maximum of potential of destruction to wipe total humanity if needed action isn't taken quicker . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all variety of violent action pictures could be removed from media so as that we don't have get right of entry to to them by using any potential . human beings can hire those forms of action pictures for couple greenbacks and get as much as combat with relatives then to next neighbor then at paintings then someplace at procuring mall ,then everywhere he does not think of precise delivered on via media and materials he can get right of entry to from cafes and celeb dollar who provide this freedom so easily . Then we try to calm the ideas it is already bombarded with plenty detrimental guidance international .
2016-10-03 06:05:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Independents
2006-11-03 06:23:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Rich white men have been running this country since it's beginning. We need more women and minorities no matter what the party.
If we always voted against the incumbent we wouldn't have this problem either.
2006-11-03 06:43:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Concerned Citizen 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Libertarians.
2006-11-03 06:26:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by lundstroms2004 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
so far both the republicans and democrats aint showing us much...are they..??? all they seem to be wanting to do is get reelected and pad their own wallets...time for a truly third choice to get in there and be part of the process..the two party system is all about power...and not to the people
2006-11-03 06:27:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by badjanssen 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
republicans have always been for the rich they take from the poor and give to the rich you have to be stupid or rep. to vote for them
2006-11-03 06:38:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by MARY ann 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Rep.
2006-11-03 07:23:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Democrats!
2006-11-03 06:26:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I would honestly say Independent.
2006-11-03 11:11:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Spread Peace and Love 7
·
0⤊
0⤋