Fascism and Communism have both been given bad raps for their abused history, but given the proper leadership both and offer security, safety, and freedom. Included in their advantages are perfect distribution of social security, free education, health care, and housing. The only negatives are slightly higher taxes. But you still have spending money left over. It's all a matter of the leadership that decides on the potential of either types of government. So considering this scenario, with a just and fair leadership, would you choose it over the failing democracy that we have now?
2006-11-03 05:09:53 · 5 answers · asked by Cyrus 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
A Communist is a communist who will misuse the power to continue in power. Once thay come it will be just very difficult to get them removed by democratic means. They believe in partyless democracy. So knowingly, why one should risk his own freedom allured by the sweet coated quinine?
2006-11-09 13:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure - A communist nation/world ran the way it was intended would be much better than the current one.a great start of this would be a flat tax (say about 10% or so) so if you make 100K 10Would be tax, if you make a 1mil a year 100K would be tax. Pay for schools, health care, and housing, then take whats left over and divide it up by number of citizens. Say that equals about 4,000 per person, if you payed 10K and get 4 back, not too bad, if you payed 100K and got 4 back sucks for you. Great way to redistribute the wealth fairly. so that takes care of your one listed downfall to Communism. Anyone remember the 80/20 rule, 80% of the money is held by 20% of the people, lets fix that.
2006-11-03 10:45:28 · answer #2 · answered by shawnloveskat4evr 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Our democracy is not failing. Not yet anyway. However, Communism goes completely agains everything our constitution stands for. Neither of these parties stand a chance BECAUSE of their failed history. Besides that, politicians are almost all unjust and unfair. Just a bunch of "yes men/women" who say what you want to hear until they get elected, then they just do what they want. All along trying to convince you that it's FOR YOU and not for themselves.
2006-11-08 01:14:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, even a failing Democracy is better than no Democracy at all!
2006-11-07 23:53:19 · answer #4 · answered by grandm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Republican.
2006-11-09 05:36:01 · answer #5 · answered by just curious 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋