English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Look at Bush's spiritual leader Ted Haggerd of the National Association of Evangelicals, with 30 million members.

Not only does he have more followers than any Democrat Presidents pet Preacher. But he is the pinnacle of NeoHighground.

Men like this are the epitome of why you should use soap on a rope when at christian retreats.

Go big Red Go

2006-11-03 03:56:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I, personally, do not want my government to be the morality police. Additionally, morality is subject, or at least based on each individuals' interpretation. So, you can't really say whether the country has become more or less moral. Example, would you say America is less moral because Massachusets now allows gay marriage? I wouldn't, but some would. Would you say we are less moral because we are going to build a new wall in the South preventing illegal immigration? Some might. Whether we're for or against Bush, I would say Americans have become more globally conscious.

2006-11-03 13:11:58 · answer #2 · answered by straightup 5 · 2 0

6 wasted, immoral and bloody years. Death is now almost a bye word. Notice the talk today about striking N Korea. Do you think it is his plan to have Armageddon? He wants to be remembered for something even though non of us will be here to tell our grand children what a pathetic period 2000-8 was.

2006-11-03 13:14:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Celloman...
What the...? the math is right...bush was elected in 2000 and it is 2006 ...dude...that is 6 years...
Morality...I do not think we are more or less moral...Our president has made choices that make us appear to be war mongers and aBully...In fact dumb bull bullies because we attacked the wrong country (iraq)...so that is just the worlds perception of us....Not reality....The other stuff..Foley and the like...That happens in every party...

2006-11-03 11:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by LENNON3804 3 · 1 1

Presidential terms are 4 years - republican arithmetic?

2006-11-03 11:42:37 · answer #5 · answered by notme 5 · 3 0

The liberals have not been able to have gay marriages approved or shut down religious activities as it appears they prefer doing. Following His beliefs has kept Bush above the crowd and His life extols His virtue whereas many in the left have shown how immoral they are. Chief among them are the people like Clinton who to this day denies oral copulation is sex. How Hillary can stay with Him is not a sign of her values but more of her lack of them.

2006-11-03 11:41:51 · answer #6 · answered by old codger 5 · 1 3

I wouldn't say that our morality has changed that much. Our priorities have changed but not our morals.

-wanda--your figures are grossly exaggerated. nice try though

-we still have two years left

2006-11-03 11:42:51 · answer #7 · answered by only p 6 · 0 1

It isn't and hasn't been for a long time. The republicans idea of morals is gay bashing.

2006-11-03 11:43:59 · answer #8 · answered by capu 5 · 2 2

The fact that our President is NOT having any affairs should be an indication that we're doing pretty good.

2006-11-03 13:07:10 · answer #9 · answered by blahbluep 2 · 1 2

It isn't, and it's not smarter either, considering this asker's inability to do arithmetic. Bush's two terms in office = 2 years plus 2 years = 6 years??

2006-11-03 11:41:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers