Can anybody explain this?
2006-11-03 02:44:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is simple; if you a are a Republican and screw up you are fired.
If you are a Democrat you blame Bush, Haliburton Karl Rove or Global Warming.
2006-11-03 02:50:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sure. Kerry knew he had made a Freudian slip and that Bush gets blamed for every damned thing like Katrina, oil prices, terrorism, murder, stupidity, speech, lack of education, warmongering, hypocrisy, and everything that goes wrong so he felt since the Americans had already been brainwashed and would be receptive to the possibility, he'd just try it. If he apologized, he would be admitting to doing wrong and it may cost the democrats votes, so he'd rather try the Bush strategy.
2006-11-03 04:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because, he is John Kerry, he supported his comment be for he was against it.
His apology was half hearted and probably written up by the Democrats.
As the Bible says, " He is a double minded man, unstable in all he does."- James 1:8
2006-11-03 03:54:59 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Agappae 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
com'on folks are we debating on a stupid guy here? we are really wasting our time on this guy. John Kerry is just happen to marry a ketchup queen and got rich and end up to where he is right now, one thing i love american is we did not vote for him to become a president of this country otherwise we'll all end up working for that ketchup facilitty that his wife has..of couse we all make mistake, this is just blank & simple. both parties hate each other that's normal they'll try to play dirty stuff against each other who's taking pucnhes? us as an american...we should all stand up for our right and look at other things to deal with rather than talking bout some stupid dude has no clue what he is talking bout..... if it wasn't for our man and women in uniform John Kerry should be worry bout his own ketchup *** rather than worry about us...dont you think?
2006-11-03 04:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by kevin n 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A president can basically get stuff achieved if their celebration controls the two chambers of Congress. Obama has very nearly no capacity good now, he lost the residing house in 2011. He basically had finished capacity for 2 years. Bush, on the different hand, had finished capacity for 6 years, he did no longer lose Congress until eventually 2007 (while the Democrats gained the two chambers). because of the fact of this Bush is lots worse than Obama and all of us realize it. He had six years to wreck usa. i do no longer think of Obama destroyed something, yet regardless of in case you do, he basically had 2 years of it.
2016-10-15 08:17:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was a mistake. He should have just said something like "I blew a line and inadvertantly insulted the very service members I support. Their job is hard enough especialy during this failed Bush policy. It was a mistake and I apologise." It would have been over and I can't imagine anyone not respecting him for saying it.
2006-11-03 02:49:17 · answer #6 · answered by JB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is an elitist ******. He thinks the world revolves around he and his wifes Ketchup empire.
Basically Kerry just sucks!
2006-11-03 03:37:31 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Haven't you learned by now? The Dems blame EVERYTHING on Bush. Even their allegedly botched jokes.
2006-11-03 03:39:11 · answer #8 · answered by mocha5isfree 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
still talking about kerry when ann coulter is on the hot seat for a possible felony charge and for saying "9/11 widows are enjoying their husbands deaths"?
2006-11-03 03:43:12 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
john kerry is a blowhard twerp that doesn't even deserve the consideration of any of his wishy-washy words.
2006-11-03 04:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋