Yet no one blames George Bush for crimes committed by American's?
Is George Bush responsible for the high rates of murder, rape, crimes against children etc?
I think he is guilty and should be treated like Saddam.
2006-11-03 02:09:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It's because we believe what George Bush says about him. We are conditioned into thinking that men like Bush and Blair are there to help, represent and protect the citizens.
They have to have someone to blame for the many mistakes they have made.
911 gave George Bush the perfect incentive he played all the people like little puppy dogs and as usual we all fall into that.
You are right George Bush should also be on trial for the acts of crime that he has committed. Same with our own government leader the puppet Tony Blair.
The government wants to control our minds and they use every opportunity to do so. How easily we fall prey to these type of people. The press also give them a helping hand in spreading lies and causing fear.
Look at what has happened in Tibet and ask yourself why no one has bothered about it.
I could list many others that we are ignorant of because they are not viable for our government and they cant get anything out of helping. There is no profit to be made so they allow such atrocities to occur.
2006-11-03 02:24:48 · answer #1 · answered by citta_uk 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
From what I have heard (and I watch alot of news) I have never heard anyone blame Saddam for the crimes commited BY Iraqis - they blame him for crimes he commited AGAINST Iraqis.
I am sure if George Bush executed thousands of his own people to test his own weaponds he would be treated in a very similar way to Saddam.
2006-11-03 02:13:15 · answer #2 · answered by abluebobcat 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because Saddam ordered the killing of his own people in a town who disagreed with him. George Bush didn't order people to go into the streets and commit the crimes.
2006-11-03 02:12:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It is true that George bush has committed crimes against humanity but but you cannot hang him as he is the president of USA (even if you do not address him so). Now you must have understood the difference between developed countries and developing countries. Countries which are developed can exercise their power on the developing countries. However i think that george bush is feeling as if he is the only person who can get rid of terrorism in this world. That is why he is acting like that. I still wonder why he has got a second term as president of USA. Maybe he has done no mistakes other than declaring wars on other countries. Going by the present events, I think that Pakistan is next in line for an attack by USA ( George Bush)
2016-03-28 05:37:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is only blamed for those crimes (against humanity) that he ordered. You know, things like putting people through woodchippers, testing chemical weapons on his own people, attempted genocide, constant defiance of UN resolutions, etc. If one could find that Bush ordered crimes to be committed, then he could be blamed.
2006-11-03 02:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by Thought 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Okay. We also have to convict Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and every other living President from either party. They all "allowed" murders and rapes to occur "on their watch".
The difference is this--
Hussein ORDERED murders, rapes, gassings and other crimes against Humanity.
No One with any real experience doubts this. And this is the reason we fought Hitler in WWII and why we would try him for his crimes had we caught him alive...
What a shame that your hatred of the man prevents you from reasoning clearly. Reasonable people can disagree on policy decisions without resorting to hate full name-calling.
2006-11-03 02:23:05 · answer #6 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no Saddam should not be guilty of crimes committed by Iraqi's only his own crimes against his people
2006-11-03 04:34:21 · answer #7 · answered by valgal115 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have no question -- mister. you have no answer mr. -- you are not in a debate mood either since you have already made up your mind. this being on record -- there is no -- absolutely "none" comparaison between bush and saddam as leaders of their respective nations. one is butcher the other one was elected by the people for the people. be respectful of the process. read about iran. and read about the democracy in usa...it would help you understand the differences in the systems. best of all..i see you live in the usa....try to make this living of yours in irak....bon voyage....
2006-11-03 04:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by s t 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dear mem....saddam was the king there ....so the king is responsible for all the things done in the country...he was the 1 who cud have stopped it al but didntl...moreover he himself used to give most of the orders....like for eg. he was the 1 who ordered to test that posion gas....
2006-11-03 02:14:24 · answer #9 · answered by Deep D 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They're called WITNESSES . Saddam also bumped off his sons-in-law . Ask his daughters .
What part of genocide and murder sounds like National Security to people like you ?
2006-11-03 07:54:06 · answer #10 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋