2006-11-03 01:51:44 · 7 answers · asked by Luisyang 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I don't think he's bad for the game. He just gets a little excited and carried away sometimes.
2006-11-03 02:30:00 · answer #1 · answered by m_p_dicerbo 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is an individual who isn't shy about openly saying what he thinks. He would never make it as a politician (but then open honesty from someone with some intelligence might be a refreshing change.) Too many in professional sports and politics now who are locked into the good Ole boy act.
2006-11-03 01:56:33 · answer #2 · answered by dano 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is good for the game but some time can get out of line.
2006-11-03 05:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by chris76ers1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMHO, if there is no one vocally questioning policies and decisions, there won't be a democracy. not all that David Stern says is gospel truth. someone has to speak out in behalf of coaches, owners, and players. Opinion is not the villian. Apathy and lack of participation is. :)
2006-11-03 04:14:56 · answer #4 · answered by thomas 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He SUCKS he should stay in the owners box like all the rest of them
2006-11-03 05:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by Ricky Lee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
There needs to be more of those types of owners. Because if all the owners are ownly serious then that makes the game not any fun!!
Hollla.... Blaze.............
2006-11-03 09:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by admafootball 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes he is
2006-11-03 01:53:34 · answer #7 · answered by bor_rabnud 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋