LOL funny one, nope those little party animals wouldn't last one week in Basic training
2006-11-03 01:36:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by tcmoosey 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Erm... Yah... False... Flatly.
Even if it was true they enlisted, there's between eight and thirteen weeks of basic training to consider, then about a year of advanced training before going ANYWHERE, let alone Iraq. And for you libs posting, that applies to ALL combat soldiers, not just Bushes.
But you know what? I love the elitest attitude displayed here. I'll bet my uncle has more to lose in this war than ANY of you. He has THREE, count 'em... THREE sons in Iraq! NONE of them were forced to go. Every single one volunteered. But you know what? He's not taking the liberal elitest way out! He's SUPPORTING our troops and SUPPORTING their commander-in-chief... Not seeking to cut them down at every turn as I see here!
In addition, the MAJORITY of 140,000,000 troops over there know exactly what they're doing, and they're proud to be doing it. Renlistment is at an all-time high! But you libs latch onto the words of a couple hundred, just like you did when those six generals spoke up...
This is absolutely P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C.
2006-11-03 10:22:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes. See those pigs fly? See the weather report about Hell freezing over?
I would not, however, be surprised if the twins join the National Guard!
Or the circus.
Wow, Firestorm, where did we come up with 140 million troops?
Is half of our population serving in Iraq?
And the argument that the service of those who have gone over there means no one is allowed to question the war is bogus. War is the single most consequential decision our government makes, so it should be questioned at least as much as issues of taxation, immigration, environmental policy, etc.
2006-11-03 09:59:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by x 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I seriously doubt that would be possible, simply because their lives are truly no longer their own since their father is the President they are constantly under watch by the secret service, they are allways in danger from whakos that would want to harm them to get at their father. Also they are a high kidnapp risk, can you imgine if some freak from an extremist country were to get ahold of one of them? It would be the first priority of any country that is our enemy to get ahold of those girls and put them up for ransom or even kill them!
Nope its highly unlikly someone is pulling your leg
2006-11-03 09:39:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by spinner4567 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! That is some funny sh*t! Do you really thing the Bush's are going over there? This is a publicity stunt for the Rep. party! If the daughters are going, it is not because they enlisted, if anything, it is to get the soldiers LAID so they will stop bitching about being over there, because every soldier stuck over there knows this is a bunch of SH*T!!
2006-11-03 09:40:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Crystal A 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
A Bush in combat?? That bunch of wimps in harms way?? Ain't ever going to happen. Besides those two are too busy getting drunk and stoned (like mom & dad used to do!) to even pass the drug test to enlist.
Whereever you read this you should avoid in the future.
2006-11-03 09:39:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by my_iq_135 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
They're following in the military footsteps of Chelsea Clinton!
2006-11-03 09:45:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Kids become adults and make their own decisions about volunterering. Why do Dems judge people by their family? Very elitist attitude.
2006-11-03 09:40:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Isn't it true Chelsea has denounced her parents as socialist?
Your point boy Kerry motivated those republicans that were considering not voting.
2006-11-03 09:42:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think they should be forced to enlist. He's so pro war lets see how he likes his daughters being in the front lines!
2006-11-03 09:42:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋