2006-11-03 01:32:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I would say none but there are a few. All serving in non combat safe zones.
Do you really think a politicians kid is going to be put in harms way? (See GWBush Jr./ National Guard... Al Gore/ military news reporter during Vietnam.)
2006-11-03 01:41:55 · answer #1 · answered by my_iq_135 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 senator, 2 congressmen. A couple others have children in the military that have not been deployed to Iraq.
2006-11-03 01:41:38 · answer #2 · answered by cool_breeze_2444 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You hit it on the top, hon. If issues have been honest, each individual might serve his u . s . for 2 years, doing something for the sturdy of the rustic --- defense force, civilian volunteer, development issues..... and this would not be a undesirable guy's combat. this may well be a volunteer military that now facilitates felons in (desperation time).... this is a job, 3 squares, and a place to stay... something many have not got at domicile.... Andy Rooney mentioned it ultimate a number of months in the past..." i presumed i might by no skill be saying this yet while usa is going to war, it is going to be fought by skill of the persons who signify usa. we % the draft lower back, and all and sundry serves." (this technique replaced into with regard to the ed. point and quantity of ex-cons interior the defense force.) Leo female would not study plenty via this terrible mistake, if we've any success in any respect, there is in basic terms no longer yet another Republican president for the duration of my life time.. Yup, his drunken little females can fly a helicopter in basic terms besides as some undesirable youngster. And regrettably, the undesirable people who're battling this stupid war do no longer comprehend that they are in basic terms cannon fodder...
2016-11-27 01:15:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not willing to bet a dime that any of them have children serving in a war zone in any capacity
2006-11-03 01:41:52 · answer #4 · answered by kilroymaster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a higher proportion than the general population.
It's been studied.
2006-11-03 01:57:35 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah hardly any, this is why they dont really care who is dying over there all they care about is the money this war is putting in thier pockets.
2006-11-03 01:41:21 · answer #6 · answered by GQsmooth 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this was question was on CNN, some lady who is running said only two
2006-11-03 01:39:32 · answer #7 · answered by paki 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i saw kerry on uk tv but i couln't make out what he was saying regards this quest
2006-11-03 01:41:25 · answer #8 · answered by srracvuee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NONE!!! Now do you understand!!! It is a bunch of bull sh*t! That is what Kerry was talking about!
2006-11-03 01:35:19 · answer #9 · answered by Crystal A 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I bet U NONE fired a SHOOT in FEAR. :)
2006-11-03 02:02:44 · answer #10 · answered by Genuis by Design 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋