2006-11-03 01:01:24 · 13 answers · asked by Shiraz!! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
edit - last
2006-11-03 01:06:03 · update #1
They won't because they're not desperate like some other groups.
2006-11-03 01:03:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
None, really.
The decisive scandals were already created by Bush. The war, and the economy will drive the votes on Tuesday
2006-11-03 09:04:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the New York Times is trying to say that when the administration posted siezed documents on the internet to show people the evidence that Saddam was busily trying to create an atom bomb, the iranians were able to go to the website and enhance their own atomic programs, based on documents found on the internet.
however, these documents also show that saddam was as little as one year away from making a bomb. hence, the ENTIRE invasion of Iraq would have been legitimate, but I dont think the NYT will be stressing that fact.
They are trying to smear bush that from siezed documents from Iraq, iran was able to speed ahead in their nuclear program.
Documents are one thing, but the Gore-Chernomyrdin act is another, in which Gore allowed Russia to transfer to iran, 2 nuclear reactors, a 10 yr supply of uranium, kilo class subs, and su-27 fighters.
which is worse? posting evidence of saddams nuclear ambitions for the world to see, or democrats actually supplying the axis of evil with nuclear reactors?
just like they gave the 2 light water reactors to north korea, along with that nice basketball signed by micheal jordan
2006-11-03 09:08:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Last night at the local Flag burning ceremony or the USSD-NC The High Priest of Global warming and Poo-Bah of Abortion said that We are going to reveal that all One million six hundred fifty three thousand Sharizes are actually only one forth grade Chinese kid with exceptional skills.
GO big Red Go
2006-11-03 09:32:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The greatest thing about your question is that any scandal, created or not, is TOO LATE to affect the outcome. The polls now indicate a huge swell of support for the REPUBLICANS.
Too early to start the party. But this is GREAT NEWS.
2006-11-03 09:12:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Republicans have the last 6 years to explain -- Dems don't have to do a damned thing to make them look stupid.
2006-11-03 09:11:18 · answer #6 · answered by martino 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The question should be, how many more scandals will the Republicans have in 5 days.
Politicians are human, and they make mistakes.
Or in John Kerry's case.....he talks before thinking.
2006-11-03 09:04:45 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What's a lat effort?
2006-11-03 09:03:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
None. No need to. The Republicans have lost.
2006-11-03 09:25:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The elections are a complete fraud .Watch the hbo special on diebold and other voting machines .
2006-11-03 09:07:01 · answer #10 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋