I have a better idea. Why not include olympics into 20-20?
2006-11-02 23:54:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by pressurekooker 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good idea. If they can have basketball and handball and volleyball..all minority sports that few people play... then there is no reason why cricket, in the 20/20 form, cannot be included in the Olympics. It is already in the Commonwealth games.
2006-11-03 00:10:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
s... having 20-20 in olympic is a good idea. only because of its long duration in play timing it was not included in olympics.. 20-20 hardly take only 4 hours.. so it is good choice but they will think about 4 hours also.. all other games take only 3 hours.
2006-11-02 23:55:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pearl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
fathimaji, yes you are correct. 20-20 cricket must be included in olympics. it is better to ban the matches other than 20-20.
2006-11-02 23:54:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by anildesk 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES THAT'S A VERY GOOD IDEA
IT'S SHORTER,PROVIDES ALL THE THRILL AND
THAT WAY CRICKET WILL BE PLAYED AT THE OLYMPICS.
WE WILL SURELY HAVE MANY MORE COUNTRIES
PLAYING 20-20 CRICKET.IT WILL SPREAD CRICKET ACROSS THE GLOBE.
BEST REGARDS,
2006-11-03 01:32:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aq 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes y r right.i love cricket well 20 -20 is a shorter game and it should be included in the olympics.BUT y only olympics cant it be included in the asian games to!!!!!!
2006-11-03 04:03:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by debin s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
for Olympics, its fine, but i dont appreciat 20-20 cricket myself.i feel it as a trailer of original game.one day game is best.
2006-11-03 06:14:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cricket shoud just stay outta the olympics. we have a world cup dont we?
2006-11-03 02:15:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by thatniceguy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The idea is great. But only IOC can taken a decision on this.
2006-11-03 18:03:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, its not as boring as ordinary cricket
2006-11-03 00:31:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lorney 2
·
0⤊
1⤋