2006-11-02 19:28:09 · 15 answers · asked by Agenda Dog 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Worse.
Scum is usually some kind of organic material, such as algae, which is eaten by organisms that form part of the food chain. As such, scum can be beneficial.
Bush, on the other hand, is utterly worthless.
2006-11-02 19:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by kensval 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Why is it that when a democratically elected person takes office people start to insult that person before long. What has Bush done that is so wrong? You may not agree with his politics but this should not lead to the unsavoury comments made against him. Here in Britain Tony Blair declared some time ago that he would not serve a full term this time round. Since then the back stabbers have been out in force, a lot in his own party. This is a man who has led the Labour Party to three consecutive election wins. Before he became leader the Labour Party was probably unelectable. Now everyone is criticising him and everything it does. If you do not like your leader simply vote against him at the next election and hope that enough other people agree with you.
2006-11-03 07:05:52 · answer #2 · answered by david c 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not at all he is the son of human scum, which makes him lower than pond scum. He wants a dictatorial governement with him incharge, he took away our rights with the patriot act, spies on citizens with warrentless wire tapps, invaded a county which was no threat to us, while allowing his business associte Ossama Bin Ladden (who bialed out wubbas oil company) to escape, ran for cover on 9/11, gave tax breaks to the wealthy and corperations that out sourced their jobs, cowered from Viet Nam by joing the Alabama guard and never showed up as he was a Texxas resident, is the most unpopular president in us history, and stole the presidency by rigging 2 elections
2006-11-03 08:24:10 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yep. Bush is human scum...kinda like what you find in a shower (i.e. soap "scum). On the other hand, we've got the elitist left-wing snob types (Kerry, Clinton, Kennedy, etc.) which take a role similar to that of a 6-month old s**t-stain just under the rim of a toilet. You know, harder than hell to get it removed, stinks all the time. So which do you prefer?
2006-11-03 03:50:24 · answer #4 · answered by Jason G 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I guess a piece of toe jam would know scum.
2006-11-03 04:21:01 · answer #5 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Bush is human.
His critics are scum.
2006-11-03 03:33:08 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He`s just a dirty stain on the bedsheets of humanity. Evil, vindictive, treacherous,sly, dishonest, dirtbag of the very highest order. No, i don`t like the bastard.
2006-11-03 03:45:23 · answer #7 · answered by dingdong 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Is Kerry an elitist snob?
2006-11-03 03:32:31 · answer #8 · answered by Brian 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. And Tokyo Rose was better at this game than you are.
2006-11-03 03:36:55 · answer #9 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, we'll leave that up to morons who ask these kinds of questions.
2006-11-03 06:27:05 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋