Recently watched the latest Amnisty International Policemans' Ball on the telly. We felt it was abysmal and in sad contrast to the original Monty Python, Peter Cook etc., originals - they were funny - I realise humour is like beauty - in the eye and ear of the beholder, but this modern version was all about political satire as apposed to just good old plain humour.
There are some modern comedians and comediens that are talented but they weren't on this show - the skit with Chevy Chase was pathetic and just not funny and he has been in some hilarious movies!
Jack Dee's Lead Baloon is funny or new on the scene - the very talented Catherine Tate - both of these had the sense not to appear on this awful politically correct, lefty diatribe of so called humour!
People want to laugh at every day stuff - not be preached at - jokes about peodophiles even if it is against them are not humerous!!
Does anyone agree that most standup acts of today just don't measure up to their predecessors?
2006-11-02
18:36:38
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Television
I realise being as it was in aid of Amnisty International there had to be reference to what this organisation stands for - but if they want to raise awareness and even better cash for their cause then one of the ways to connect with people is to make them laugh not make them more cynical and send them away with a nasty taste in their mouths. If you want people to buy the cds and videos of this event to pass on the benefits to the people you are fighting for, then surely the product should contain what is advertised on the cover - namely HUMOUR ?
2006-11-02
18:37:35 ·
update #1