English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-02 17:05:38 · 15 answers · asked by jimjones3 4 in Arts & Humanities History

15 answers

No, but I would have encouraged him to stick with art and painting. He could have expressed all his political ambitions in a non-harmful medium. But you can't guarantee how anyone will turn out.

2006-11-02 17:10:54 · answer #1 · answered by Cookie777 6 · 2 0

Ok, say somebody could do this: Hitler is dead and no nazifascism, as our parents have seen, would exist.

I am quite sure some other charismatic person would have emerged in Germany to lead this angry country.
You got to face it: Germany was suffering a terrible punishment after the defeat in WWI, and France is to be blamed. The French were still angry for having lost the Franco-Prussian war of 1871, that led to the unification of the German Empire, and wanted Germany on it's knees, incapable to cause any harm (to their country). Add a huge war debt and the great depression (in 1931 1 dollar was 4'200 BILLIONS marks) and you have a population that would follow any leader promising a better tomorrow. The brown shirts were simply the voice of an angry large part of the Germans that were realizing that their country had been unjustly punished, and was falling to pieces (Bavaria tried to separate itself creating a Socialist Republic in 1920, but the army quickly intervened).

No, killing Hitler wouldn't bring anything good.

2006-11-03 04:27:44 · answer #2 · answered by ale_limp 2 · 1 0

If you could go back into time and were able to kill Hitler when he was a baby, would you do it?

You wouldn't dare kill him, haven't you learned not to mess with the space time continuum? Consider the possible consequence. You kill Hitler as a young child, years later, say 1933, Ernst Roehm instead becomes dictator, in mid 1930s, HE decides to begin 'heavy water' experiments which lead to the first nuclear bomb built in 1939. With that device, he easiliy defeats mother russia and the allies, and the Final Solution is 'completed.'

2006-11-03 20:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

I think if I were to go back in time I would go further than Hitler, but to back to the beginning Genesis, and take the apple away from Eve and therefore she would not have given it to Adam, and so on. Meaning we would not be here on earth. So where would we be then? We dont know and that is what the world and vision is all about the future, and no one has a crystal ball. The statement made that makes more sense is "What we do in Life ergo an eternity."

2006-11-03 03:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hmmmmmm....lets say you killed Hitler and no evil one existed to take his place. Stalin rises to power and builds the Russian war machine. Being the nut that he was he decides to export his murderous marxist theory to Europe in the same blitzkreig fashion the Reich did and over runs Europe. The Japanese attack China in the East and there is no second front to weaken the Soviet expeditionary force. the D-Day invasion is repulsed and driven into the sea. Russia acquires nukes and obliterates Japan instead of stopping after 2 bombs. Eisenhower and Montgomery's forces were wiped out at D-Day and Stalin claims Camp David as his summer cottage.
LEAVE THE TIMELINE ALONE!

2006-11-03 01:16:23 · answer #5 · answered by Norman 7 · 2 0

The idea of someone going back in time and killing Hitler before he came to power has already been tried.

2006-11-03 01:08:30 · answer #6 · answered by sangheilizim 4 · 1 0

No. The way I look at it, it wasn't his fault that he turned out that way it had to do with how he was raised. Maybe if his parents weren't prejudiced he could have been a nice guy. What you have to remember though is that Hitler himself was actually a Jew and that he did eventually kill himself, so obviously he did have some guilt about what he did.

2006-11-03 04:00:56 · answer #7 · answered by ladydanu_sm69 1 · 0 0

as a baby hitler was innocent.i believed what led to his transformation was because of a man called Dr.Edmund Forster.see hitler emerged from the war with hysterical blindness(not blindness from mustard gas poisoning,as many believed).Hitler was treated by the controversial psychiatrist Edmund Forster,whose methods including telling patients that only the strength of their will and personality could bring them to recovery.once Hitler found that by sheer that he could cure his own blindness,the next step was obvious to him.

2006-11-03 01:23:08 · answer #8 · answered by krishna s 2 · 1 0

I think I would go back to change the opinions of the Art experts in Austria. If he would have been allowed to study, he could have died as an unknown scenery painter.

2006-11-03 02:55:40 · answer #9 · answered by tichur 7 · 0 1

Or put it this way ,And think, All History,from his time would be changed ! Your parence most likly wood not have mete and you wood not be hear to ask the question too start with !!!

2006-11-03 01:41:19 · answer #10 · answered by cornelius p 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers