You are correct. No attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11.
the libs are already trying to distort your comment.
2006-11-02 16:56:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Liberals desperately hate the fact that president Bush is doing such a good job . You are so right -no attacks since 9/11 . The economy is great , too . Liberals don't have things to save anyone from when George Bush is at the helm . A president like Bush ruins it for the libs because they know IF they ever win another election they will be held to the same high standards as GW Bush-not a Clinton disgrace ..Bush is anything but a failure . He's my hero .
2006-11-03 01:48:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No attacks on America in the past 5 years.... what does that prove. There were no attacks on America in 6 years prior to 9-11. Guess you should also be telling us how great Clinton was and how we should be thanking him for protecting us. No, I don't think that will happen.
How can you possibly even try to imagine it would be worse if Al Gore was president. Hey if he was we might have captured bin Ladin.
And by the way, the attack previous to 9-11 was by an American in Oklahoma City. And he was a registered Republican.
2006-11-03 01:09:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because many of the terrorists have transferred to Iraq for additional training to kill Americans there. As of this month, they succeeded in killing as many Americans in Iraq as in the 9/11 attacks. I guess there haven't any more 9/11 attacks here because they are just too busy there!
2006-11-03 02:08:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Murphyboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Had we not gone to war this country wouldnt have been respected nor feared by anyone and this mess with N. Korea would be a HUGE deal. If we pull out of Iraq right now then we have wasted the lives of 3000 American soldiers and we would lose all respect and no one would fear us (again same problem) and then when we would constantly be protecting ourselves from enemies. The liberals are just clueless about what to do when it comes to war...you do not negotiate with terrorists, its not possible. This is the same Muslim radicals who said that the Pope should become Muslim or else he is not safe (load of crap). What do you think they want? Respect from us? No, they want us dead...you dont negotiate with that...
2006-11-03 00:57:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by gwbgod 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Isn't the real question, why didnt he prevent the first attack? I mean, why were there no attacks on America in the past 5 years BEFORE Bush...or the 5 years before that...
2006-11-03 03:03:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Oz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously you believe in overkill. I haven't heard of anyone complaining about his actions in Afghanistan where Bin Laden was headquartered.
Bush took the war to Iraq and sent our soldiers there to fight terrorism. Have you looked into that? Do you agree with it.
2006-11-03 01:02:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by taurus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hes not a failer- hes a president with a Big responsibility..
Still finding Human remains in N.Y. from the Victims of the attack ,after all this time. how sad.
2006-11-03 00:59:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by ole_lady_93 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No recent attacks. But shortly after 911 a boat carrying a bunch of people from Haiti beached itself on the coast of Florida. Not a bad way to deliver a nuke. I heard our Gov. was going to put Arabs in charge of our ports. Guess were too busy in Iraq.
2006-11-03 01:10:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by HotGringo 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
First off, 'cry you stupid conservative' stop being such a tree hugger.
And second, going on the offense has seen to work.
2006-11-03 00:57:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by iubball85 2
·
0⤊
1⤋