I'm becoming very confused by all of this. If the leader of the church, Ted H. was advising my president on matters such as a constitutional ammendment to ban gay marriage, while at the same time he was paying a male prostitute to have sex with him, doesn't that mean that the leader of this church really is for gay marriage?
Can someone help me straighten this out? Wouldn't gay marriage have been preferrable to gay prostitution???
2006-11-02
16:23:54
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Ruth the M - Why in the world would a country's open tolerance of gays present any form of a threat to you? Granted it would be a few less men that wouldn't be available for you but in reality, they aren't meant to be with you in the first place...
2006-11-02
17:01:06 ·
update #1