more so than a president who is pressured by the other party controlling both Houses?
A president who does not have his party controlling most of Congress is limited more in what he can do. Bush hasn't had to worry about this though.
Our Congress gives into just about every one of our president's demands.
Just for the record, Clinton's Congress was predominantly republican starting in 1994.
2006-11-02 14:36:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES...........
AND THAT PARTY SHOULD HOLD SAID PRESIDENT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY WRONG DOINGS....
2006-11-02 14:39:03 · answer #1 · answered by cork 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Honestly I don't think it matters with President Bush, liberals blame him for everything anyway.
2006-11-02 22:44:30 · answer #2 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes he should be held accountable for his own mistakes, and or successes; this goes for gop's and Dem's. In the end each president really has their own say.
2006-11-02 22:40:21 · answer #3 · answered by jamesagambrell 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the president is a figure head, if he were to control both congress and senate, he'd be a dictator.
2006-11-02 22:40:59 · answer #4 · answered by FireBug 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah and your not the only one thats noticed this. Bush is an idiot and an unrestricted one at that. Be afraid, very afraid.
2006-11-02 22:39:41 · answer #5 · answered by imajiknation 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yes that is wear the buck stops.
2006-11-02 22:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No! Many, many votes were counted on both sides to go to Iraq.
2006-11-02 22:40:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋