2006-11-02 14:34:41 · 5 answers · asked by T B 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Renting & Real Estate
Most of the time not....
SORRY
2006-11-04 16:05:29 · answer #1 · answered by Shaunna H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having your property treated for termites does not make the property uninhabitable, as they drill into the concrete and inject chemicals into the ground, where termites come from. They may spot treat the exact area where the termites are, but this does not mean you need to pack up to spend the night elsewhere. So the answer is no, the landlord should not pay for your motel.
2006-11-02 14:58:47 · answer #2 · answered by Cheeky Realtor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
READ YOUR LEASE!!! If the apartment is inhabitable then yes they must at least put you in a vacant apartment or pay for your stay at a motel. where i work even if the apartment catches on fire and its not your fault, we are required to put the family up at our expense.
2006-11-04 02:05:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If not... at least you should not have to pay for the number of days that you are not allowed to stay in the apartment. Your lease should state that you are paying a certain amount of money for a certain number of days. He is responsible for having the apartment livable.. electric, water, sewer, heat, ect.
2006-11-02 14:43:13 · answer #4 · answered by the_buccaru 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should since your home isn't livable
2006-11-02 14:37:13 · answer #5 · answered by Ronka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋