Basically because he was the most powerfull man of his time. He had under his control an empire where there were no sunset.
Countries under his command were, Spain, Portugal, half Italy and Netherlands in Europe, different cities and ports in North Africa, from Patagonia to Colorado in America and Philipine Islands (see the name, from Philip) in Asia.
Though he was quite liberal and moderate, he had past to history as a villain, mostly due to the religion wars held against the protestants in Netherlands and the different wars against the Britons.
Anticatolicism and the need of justification of British empire created a Black Legend over Spain, in which the mayor monster and evil was him. Today, this vision is being revised by the british historiography. See studies over that published by Oxford University.
Anyhow, for Spain, the catholic politics of him, his father and his descendans (Philip III, Philip IV and Charles II) was an economical disaster that led Spain to numerous bankrupcies.
He was atacked inside Spain by the "comuneros", who represented the castillian burgeosists due to the economical impact of the religion wars and their traditional alliance with the Duch industry. He was also atacked by the "Germanias" who promoted luteranism in Spain. Both movements were fierly represed.
Despite of what it has been said, Philip II did not want a war against Britain. He was concious of the dificulties of an invasion to England, and he had always refused to do so. But, the continuos assaults to Spanish Cities in america, and finally the assault and pillage of La Coruña in continental Spain by Sir Frances Drake (or the Pirate Drake as called by the Spaniards) forced him to ask for revenge.
Before of the departure of the "Armada", the bets in Paris were 5 to 1 in favour of the British, so the adjective invencible is quite naif.
Anyhow, despite of his errors Spain continued being the most important power in the world for more than 60 years after his dead.
2006-11-03 01:53:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by ocatarinetabelachitcix 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
he's substantial using fact he replaced into the main powerful ruler in Europe throughout his time on the throne. He had hobbies interior the Netherlands, England, and needless to say Spains territorial acquisitions following the crossing of the Atlantic by capacity of Christopher Columbus some 50 years previously. He inherited a great deficit from his father, the previous ruler of Spain, and had to handle this situation besides. He considered himself using fact the favourite defender of Europe from the Ottoman Empire, and dealt with numerous revolts even interior of his very own united states (from the conquered and switched over former Islamic Moors). there is not any formal training for Philip II, lots of his judgements have been made the two with co-suggestions, or by way of an advisory board.
2016-10-21 04:29:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he failed utterly to suppress the dutch revolt, in part because he was completely bankrupt but also because he was unbelievably indecisive. he wrote letters that basically said, you could do this, but on the other hand, maybe it would be better to do that... although perhaps there's a third way?
his failure to put down the revolt split the netherlands in two - one half became firmly protestant, whilst the southern part of the netherlands remained catholic.
he also continued charles v's fight against the ottoman turks in the east. they had a huge empire and sought to extend it well into europe - in charles v's reign, they reached austria and laid siege to vienna. without philip, much of europe could have ended up following islam as a chief religion.
2006-11-02 23:49:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by elle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm pretty sure he was the king that tried to invade England when Elizabeth? was reigning. He formed the Spanish Armada but his fleet of ships was destroyed when he tried to invade and that pretty much ended Spain's rule as a strong western Europe power he sent the armada after England allowed Dutch rebels into the country. he sent two more fleets but those failed as well, he was married to Mary Tudor (Bloody Mary) but when she died they had no kids, so his hopes of ruling England as a catholic country diminished
hope this was what you were looking for
2006-11-02 14:34:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Deborah 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
he brought the hispanics to America
2006-11-02 14:34:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ruth Less RN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋