C'mon, Hillary is at least as accomplished (I refuse to say good) an actor as "I'm not Fonda" Jane. Just look at her history. She's gotten herself out from under criminal indictment when it's clear as day that she was up to her eyeballs in the corrupt deals in Arkansas. She feigned all that outrage at her womanizing husband and had Oprah eating out of her hand when she set up half of his liaisons to keep him busy and out of her hair. She pretends to be a mommy to Chelsea, who's strangely missing from all this. She convinced the morons in New York that she was working for them, and let's not forget that performance in the Senate hearings when she put the trash-mouth on Secretary Rumsfeld when she actually isn't fit to shine his shoes.
I think Hillary is quite the thespian, THAT'S THESPIAN, the other, similar-sounding word is a distinct possibility but who cares about that.
2006-11-02 14:41:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
I honestly hope it's not the same Jane Fonda that crucified our military some years back- I know it's a divine thing to forgive, but how easily we forget- Jane Fonda had the opportunity to do the right thing, but just like our GOP (Democrats too)- she didn't- instead, she went in for her own benefit.
So you think she's changed? Let me tell you- take a cow, clean it up, process it, put it in a pretty can and call it corned beef- guess what? It's still a cow!
Hillary at least has some brains, being a "used car saleswoman" doesn't make Jane Doe (Fonda) a qualified candidate.
2006-11-02 14:39:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by BadAss 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ya know...I wouldn't want either in the White House but, I believe I would have to agree with you Fonda would win over Clinton hands down. She at least has some idea of how to run a business..
2006-11-02 14:29:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by DrK 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No offense my friend, but you are "nut's" They are both insane women that have screwed this country over. I'm a US Marine with 30 years and I seen what Jane Fonda did to this country, her and John Kerry are in my mind, traitors to America. And you think she cares! Your crazy! As far as Hilary she is a smart women but I don't want her in charge of this country. She does the old Democratic "Waffle" all the time. She bends with whatever the trend is at the time. At least President Bush sticks up for us and what he believes, I don't agree with everything he has done but at least he has the guts to stay the course! Semper Fi and God Bless America! MGYSGT WOODALL USMC (retired)
2006-11-02 14:40:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by basscatcher 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Acting really dosen't matter as a president. Hillary has far more legal and governmental experience that make her far more qualified for the job.
But granted, Jane would probably make a better campaigner.
2006-11-02 14:29:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Politics 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah I guess you're right about the acting. Hanoi Jane could probably act better than Hilary. But I still think they BOTH are TROUBLE!!
2006-11-02 15:10:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bijous 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Did someone just say "Are members of the GOP still angry over that?"
That's good. So the GOP are the only ones concerned about her behavior. I wonder how the vast majority of the veterans feel about her?
Thanks for admitting that Democrats have surely forgiven Hanoi Jane.
2006-11-02 14:35:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wow, that would really be a slap in our face, wouldn't it. Fonda as President and oh, let me guess, Kerry as Vice President.
Sorry, I wouldn't vote for either, umm, ladies.
2006-11-02 14:59:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by sassy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Jane has a nice tight *** for her age. I'll go with Jane, at least she had the guts to apologize for meeting with North Vietnamese leaders. kerry never did.He's still a punk.
2006-11-02 15:08:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Anyone would make a better president than Hillary
2006-11-02 15:05:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by scallywag 3
·
3⤊
1⤋