THESE ARE NO SENSE RUMOURS AND THIS JOB IS DONE BY THE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT WANT PEACE IN OUR COUNTRY. DO NOT CARE ABOUT THESE RUMOURS.
2006-11-02 14:08:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tachu5 (above) has already given about Mr. P.N.Oak, historian's contention in the matter. I do not want to repeat the same - however please note-
Purushottam Nagesh Oak (born 1917), usually known as P. N. Oak, is a Maharashtrian Brahmin historian associated with the Hindutva movement.
He has also claimed that the Taj Mahal and other buildings ascribed to Muslim Indians were actually converted shrines to Hindu deities.
Also Stephen Knapp has claimed similarly and in his website he has attached several photographs what lead us to believe there was/is a Shiva Temple in Tajmahal. I request you to see the photos in this website positively.
We are tend to realise it is true because, the Mughals when they ruled India in many of Hindu's holy worship places, build mosques and ruined the properties and taken away valuables from the temples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.N._Oak
http://www.hinduism.co.za/kaabaa.htm
By P.N. Oak (Historian) -Was the Kaaba Originally a Hindu Temple?
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm
( Was the Taj Mahal a Vedic Temple?. Retrieved on 2005-10-03. — Stephen Knapp's website, containing many photographs supporting Oak's claims)
2006-11-02 16:43:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The interest in Taj goes far into the legends of the mountains. A
scientist in 1820 found that the stars arrange much like Stonehenge over
Taj temples. Today there are 61,000 temples all administered by the
Catholic missionaires. This is written in the Tao Muxzk a book of the
Stargate astrology. Each planet is assigned 24 points by its actual
archetecture like it were a garden of botany, and its guidance systems is
the noah's ark reliance, a set of drawings in the sacred temple that is said
to be of the ships of Noah in mineral farming. However the temple works
it is off the scale of invisibilities in terms of the eyesight of the north, south,
western intellect and only within eastern vision limits by small points.
2006-11-02 14:30:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by mtvtoni 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Everything depends on our mind. The first person who thought about The Taj, told that it is the grave of Mr. Sahah Jahan. So we accept it. If i/you tell others that it is/was in fact contructed as a Shiv Temple, then the one thinking like us will surely accept it. But not the other fools. They only accept blindly, what they are said by Parents or teachers or someone who is great in thier eyes.
2006-11-02 21:35:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prof Oak Taj Mahal
2016-12-18 06:33:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Has anyone disproved the evidences given by Porf.OAK.Has there been any further examination of Prof. OAK's thesis to establish that Taj MAhal was a shiva temple. If that is done we shall know the truth.
2006-11-02 16:08:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by SGraja 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are extra ruins of Hindu temples in India destroyed by capacity of the mutual recriminations of Shaivites and the Vaishnavas than those destroyed by capacity of any invaders. we ought to furnish some relax to acquaintances like Prof, o.ok.and get on with the background that we've incredibly of re-writing it. there will be no end to such twisted histories. As and while distinctive colorations of opinion benefit impression adequate to develop right into a humiliation for the ruler of the day, a sparkling attempt at rewriting background or faith will persist with.while Askhoka the large replaced into in capacity, Peace replaced into well-known. It took in basic terms 2 generations previously conflict regained its help interior the nation-states of capacity.Nehruji replaced into an recommend of Nuclear loose international, yet India had to % deterrent weapons while yet another political climate demanded it. yet nevertheless , we've faith in an finally Nuclear weapon loose international for ensuring peace and fairness between international locations. Dig feet below the floor of any area of the international and you will locate evidence of notably distinctive existence of persons who lived there , could be some hundred years returned. could desire to we kill one yet another interior the call of restoring all those previous losses? The depths at which remnants of previous entities have been modern in Ayodhya does no longer be the creation of a rampaging adversarial military ,however the artwork of the inevtable leveller of all... TIME. the comparable good judgment holds sturdy for Taj Mahal --Tejomahal Controversy.
2016-10-21 04:25:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
see people may be of different religions but they are people except having lived in different traditions views and viewpoints and way of living.That's said some are just jealous of the work of others while some others want to disrupt peace for their own greedy reasons or it is just a religiously patriotic fervour nothing else or it is really true.If i say the whole universe is controlled by Aliens who are actually programming us and making us live like lab rats except that we don't know that.
People just say what they want to say for a million year they have cultivated this habit proving to the world that what they have said is right and the rest is taboo.Is utterly anyone else belief.
2006-11-02 23:29:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by varun 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle,Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an xceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale
created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's
death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural
inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples
2006-11-02 13:57:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by thachu5 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
poor Shajahon He loved his wife and built Tajmahal. If he is alive today he could have made you carry stones and things to built Tajmahal.
2006-11-06 05:58:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bharathi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋