Is any evidence about Tajmahal to be a Shiv Temple ?

Question

There r few concept regarding Tajmahal to be a very old Shiv Temple. Are any proofs regarding this found there ?

Answer 1

THESE ARE RUMOURS AND CREATED BY THE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT WANT PEACE IN OUR COUNTRY. DO NOT CARE TOWARDS THESE THINGS.

Answer 2

There are more ruins of Hindu temples in India destroyed by the mutual recriminations of Shaivites and the Vaishnavas than those destroyed by any invaders. We need to give some rest to friends like Prof, Oak and get on with the history that we have instead of re-writing it. There will be no end to such twisted histories. As and when different shades of opinion gain influence enough to become an embarrassment for the ruler of the day, a new attempt at rewriting History or religion will follow.When Askhoka the Great was in power, Peace was fashionable. It took only two generations before war regained its support in the realms of power.Nehruji was an advocate of Nuclear free world, but India had to opt for deterrent weapons when another political climate demanded it. But still , we believe in an ultimately Nuclear weapon free world for ensuring peace and equity between Nations.

Dig five hundred feet below the surface of any part of the world and you will find evidence of drastically different lifestyles of people who lived there , may be a few hundred years back. Should we kill each other in the name of restoring all those past losses? The depths at which remnants of old entities were found in Ayodhya would not be the creation of a rampaging hostile army ,but the work of the inevtable leveller of all... TIME. The same logic holds good for Taj Mahal --Tejomahal Controversy.

Answer 3

Taj mahal is an ancient Shiv Temple as the domb is just like Temples which you can see urlsef

Answer 4

The activity in Taj is going some distance into the legends of the mountains. A scientist in 1820 found that the celebs organize very similar to Stonehenge over Taj temples. immediately there are sixty one,000 temples all administered by capacity of the Catholic missionaires. it is written interior the Tao Muxzk a e book of the Stargate astrology. each and each planet is assigned 24 factors by capacity of its rather archetecture like it have been a backyard of botany, and its practise systems is the noah's ark reliance, a sequence of drawings interior the sacred temple it incredibly is declared to be of the ships of Noah in mineral farming. in spite of the indisputable fact that the temple works it incredibly is off the size of invisibilities in terms of the eyesight of the north, south, western mind and in basic terms interior of jap resourceful and prescient limits by capacity of small factors.

Answer 5

Purushottam Nagesh Oak (born 1917), usually known as P. N. Oak, is a Maharashtrian Brahmin historian associated with the Hindutva movement.

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle,Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an xceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale
created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's
death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural
inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples

He has also claimed that the Taj Mahal and other buildings ascribed to Muslim Indians were actually converted shrines to Hindu deities.

Also Stephen Knapp has claimed similarly and in his website he has attached several photographs what lead us to believe there was/is a Shiva Temple in Tajmahal. I request you to see the photos in this website positively.

We are tend to realise it is true because, the Mughals when they ruled India in many of Hindu's holy worship places, build mosques and ruined the properties and taken away valuables from the temples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/p.n._oak...
http://www.hinduism.co.za/kaabaa.htm...
By P.N. Oak (Historian) -Was the Kaaba Originally a Hindu Temple?

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj...
( Was the Taj Mahal a Vedic Temple?. Retrieved on 2005-10-03. — Stephen Knapp's website, containing many photographs supporting Oak's claims)

Answer 6

many evidences destroyed by terrorist,cruel mughals ,others

Answer 7

I dunno about Taj but I think Eiffel Tower and White house are!