English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

THINK ABOUT THE MOON LANDINGS ALL THEM YEARS BACK!!!
WHY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS ARE BOARD MULTI MILLIONAIRS NOT BOUNCING AROUND UP THERE AS WE SPEAK????????????????

DID IT HAPPEN WHEN THEY CLAIMED OR INDEED HAS MAN NEVER BEEN TO THE MOON.

SHOW YA PROOF NOT TELEVISED IMAGES OR SATALITE IMAGES............

2006-11-02 12:59:15 · 8 answers · asked by Biffanio 1 in Society & Culture Mythology & Folklore

8 answers

One school of thought is that NASA cancelled the moon shots because they found evidence that the moon was being used by something else (besides Humans) to observe Earth !

2006-11-02 13:04:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This moon landing conspiracy theory is pretty old.
From the Skeptical Inquirer - James Scotti

1. No stars are visible in the sky. The program claimed that since there is no atmosphere, stars should be visible in the black sky of the lunar surface photographs, yet none are visible. Despite having two photographic experts in their number, the pro-hoax proponents are unable to recognize the reason the stars are not seen. The photographic exposures are set to record a brightly-lit daylight scene. These exposures are nearly identical with the exposures expected on Earth and are too short to correctly expose the faint images of stars.

2. The flags are seen to wave as if in a breeze. The Fox special showed several instances of the American flag flapping around as if it were blowing in a wind, despite the lunar vacuum. However, in every instance, an astronaut can be seen actively adjusting the flag or having just finished adjusting the flag. After the motion damps out, the flag comes to rest, just as it should. In one telling scene, an astronaut is actually twisting the flagpole as the viewer is expected not to notice.

3. Identical backgrounds are seen with differing foreground objects. The Fox special showed two photographs obtained during the Apollo 15 flight. One showed the Lunar Module sitting in front of a background of mountains. The second photograph shows the same background mountains, but with a boulder-filled crater in the foreground. This apparent anomaly shows just how uncritical the Fox special was. The mountains in question are several miles behind the Lunar Module. Two photographs taken even a few hundred feet apart can show the same mountains, nearly unchanged, especially at the level of examination shown on the program, with two rather different foregrounds.

4. You can see details in the shadows. The hoax proponents claim that without an atmosphere, there should be no details visible in the shadows, since there is only one light source--the Sun. However, once again they overlook the obvious explanation, namely that light scatters off of objects including the lunar surface itself, as well as astronauts and their equipment and fills the shadows with light. The scattered light from the surface is an effective source of shadow illumination. Any teal photographic expert should be familiar with the use of reflectors to help fill a shadow, yet the two such "experts" on the Fox special fail to mention this important detail.

5. Comparison with Capricorn One. At one point, the producer of Capricorn One compares the budget of his film to the total budget of the Apollo program and suggests that the relative budgets would allow the nearly perfect fakery of the Apollo missions. The narrator goes on to compare the events in the Moon landing films with those from the movie, suggesting even that perhaps the Moon landing copied the movie. The narrator failed to point out that the film was released in 1977, some eight years after the first Moon landing.

2006-11-02 13:10:21 · answer #2 · answered by digitsis 4 · 2 0

because the multi millionaires are seldom in the proper physical condition to be able to handle the launch, let alone the landing.

because the multi millionaires do not have the desire to spend months in training learning to adapt to zero G.

because one mishap would be a public relations nightmare and open the government up to lawsuits.

there is enough proof of the moon landings that any really intellegent person can clearly see that it was a political move to try to show that we were better than Russia. and that there is nothing of any value there so we have no reason to go back.

all of the shadowing effects can be seen on earth in deserts.

ever try to see the stars from a well lit city, like new york? light on the surface interfeers with the ability of the human eye to see stars. it simply overpowers them. now put yourself on the bright side of the moon, that is reflecting the light of the sun. and try to see the stars. the camera works the same way.

besides if they did do it in a studio like the conspiracy theory says.....do you really think that they would have forgot to put stars in the damn thing.

2006-11-02 16:06:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

We don't go to the moon anymore because there is nothing of value for us there.

The space program back then was a race to the moon by us and Russia. We were in the middle of the cold war and we were afraid that Russia would beat us there and use the moon as a military base.

We have been friends with Russia for many years now and the cold war no longer exists.

2006-11-02 14:33:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

See, people aren't going to the moon because it is A. uneconomic, B. pointless, and C. pointless. There is nothing on the moon. We also don't have the technology. We know HOW, but we'd have to build it all again, none of the old equipment would still work. Besides, who cares whether or not we've been to the moon. Does it honsetly matter? Soviet Russia is no longer, America is the only remaining superpower that has more important things to worry about. If you want to go to the moon and eliminate all of the observing "aliens" then go ahead. If you want to believe what NASA says, then go ahead, and if you just want to keep thinking up conspiracy theories, go ahead, just don't try to convert everyone to your cause. Oh, and by the way, show proof that we HAVEN'T been to the moon, and one of these days look at it through a powerful telescope, you can see the remnants of the lunar landers, so if want proof, then there it is. Just stop trying to undermine the government, they know what's best for you.

2006-11-02 13:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mozer 3 · 1 3

Yes, there were numerous moon landings dacades ago...
Proof is in such abundance that denials are not even dignified
by answers from legitimate scientists...

2006-11-02 13:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

well you cannot Go to Moon without Proper Visa ;)

2006-11-02 21:00:10 · answer #7 · answered by Parsu 4 · 1 0

because it would be economically unfeasible to go again. we have already " been there done that " and until such time as space exploration starts returning some profit think these space programs are mothballed as the saying goes.

2006-11-03 05:17:47 · answer #8 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers