This question was brought up by Dicko in the show in one of the earlier tribal councils and now having seen the end results, do you think you can advance in a competition like Celebrity Survivor by playing fair?
2006-11-02 12:50:06 · 13 answers · asked by Justin Melvey 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
For the official Celebrity Survivor site go to http://www.yahoo7.com.au/celebritysurvivor
2006-11-02 12:50:55 · update #1
i would like to think so, but there will always be some sneaking around, a few little white lies, your best chance of advancing is laying low at first and let them take out the loud and strong ones, the ones that will annoy, when there gone, stand up be your self and then play the game, but with out a strong alliance, you don't stand a chance no matter how sweet you are.
2006-11-02 13:01:09 · answer #1 · answered by iMaTwin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there has ever been a player in any Survivor that has been 100% fair or honest. It's what keeps it exciting. With that said, I don't think that Survivor itself is very fair. You would think when people are voted off, they're gone and shouldn't be brought back, and yet someone that left and got to be refreshed and have his mind cleared of the game came back to win. That in itself is the ultimate in unfair in my opinion. After Justin and Guy were allowed back in, I quite honestly lost interest in the show and pretty much stopped watching. It was only by mistake that I found out who won, not by actually watching. Not sure I'll waste my time to watch if there is another and this is someone who has never missed a Survivor series, ever! :)
2006-11-03 23:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by Carrie B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One cannot win Survivor by playing fair! It all depends on the network's master plan. Right from the outset, most of the challenges required strength, stamina and swimming prowess. The girls were certainly no match with the guys, especially Guy. The girls worked hard, fought hard to the point that there were only two girls left - incredible achievements as they were out of their comfort zones! Then what happened? They brought the guys back who were previously eliminated. This doesn't happen in any sport(s) that's played fairly. At the end, is it FAIR - I DON'T think so!!! If the plot doesn't change, I won't be viewing anymore.
2006-11-02 18:04:29 · answer #3 · answered by ViewerNoMore 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i do not beleive that Guy should have won Celebrity Survivor i truley beleive little Imogen won that compotion she worked hard from the very 1st day and tried her best in the challenges i know Guy said he did not make the rules but he played by them well the rules were wrong iv watched every Survivor series the American original and the couple of Australian ones and i have to say Ch7 you got it wrong once our out then you should stay out this man had 6days away from comp and no matter how he won Probably because he's a hero to many in mine and many peoples eyes Imogen Bailey won Aussie Celebrity Survivor. PS Someone PLEASE tell the polly (David) it was a GAME i think he thought he was in Parliment 1/2 the time typical polly for you.next time get it right ch7 or uv lost a veiwer very unfair.
2006-11-03 12:12:47 · answer #4 · answered by isabell w 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely, the Aussies as is their wont will play complicated, it is not open to talk! some gamers play ought to call the enjoying cards or the pictures like Clarke, Chris Rogers (ask your self), Faulkner, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle, Lyon & Doherty. at cases England must be very liable to the colourful Aussie side yet that's it, I subject lots with regard to the Aussie batting, a potential for a protracted time now. The bowling grew to become into consistently promising, a good crop of rapid bowlers being available like Jackson chicken, Hastings, Kane Richardson all with some good p.c.. & flow. regardless of the shown fact that, the promising batters have not come by way of, Khwaja no longer in desire, Cowan promising yet no longer completely good, Warner merely customary for pulling the rabbit out of the hat & Maxwell untested at this point. Yea, England somewhat are the outright favorites, its merely a count of time no count if the Aussies capitulate interior the 1st attempt or no longer! which will deliver shivers down their necks & in the event that they are down 3-0, then the Ashes urn comes returned to previous blighty
2016-12-28 11:27:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I believe the object of the game survivor does not include playing fair, but doing whatever it takes to get to the end.
2006-11-02 23:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by Rebecca C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think I'd even get on the Celebrity Survivor show!! Therefore, NO i wouldn't advance because I'm not a celebrity!!
2006-11-02 13:02:57 · answer #7 · answered by lauralily86 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In general? No! Because if everybody would play fair, nobody would watch the show! We are a strange species, people watch because of somebody's foul play or cheeting or whatever just for the sensation of it. Keeps it interesting.
For me personally, I was only interested in seeing Justin win and he should have. But I'm proud of him anyway (always) being second! I love him lots........
2006-11-03 10:14:26 · answer #8 · answered by boa2bite 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
survivor is a game with very little rules wot ever you do ur playing fair its not youre fault the others didnt think of it
2006-11-04 09:34:14 · answer #9 · answered by gonny h 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not but you tried your best and you did a great job, you should have won.I love you and i am shocked that Gabby back stabbed you again. I would never do that to you.I will miss you ,on Thursday nights especially.I am so proud of you.
Love Kimberlie.
2006-11-02 13:57:02 · answer #10 · answered by kimberlie m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋