Was Iraq better before the war?

Answer 1

Uhhhhh let me see, Saddam,... uh HELL NO

Answer 2

You people are so closed minded and just a typical fly in a jar.

1. How would you know how it was to live without freedom, since its so obvious you take your democracy for granted (you cant see that, I do)
2. Do you know what it was like to live without freedom of religion, speech, lack of women rights? No but you sure act as if you know? Again u take your freedom for granted like the spoiled little american you are. So oblivious to anything outside your cozy little neighborhood with your cozy little job with your cozy little life.
3. You know about the Iraqi people? Before or after?
4. Live free or die, I take it doesn't matter to you?


Later liberal hypocrite, its funny how blind a person can be when they think their eyes are so wide open, try being unbias and objective and maybe you can somehow offer a decent argument, Bush lies, haha, who cares name me a president that hasnt. Bush is terrible, actually the economy is good and his only blurp is the Iraq war, WHICH YOU DEMS VOTED FOR, you people are so typical I am sick of arguing since its like talking to a brick wall or a 2 year old child, pick one that suits you.

Answer 3

hmmmm, that is a tough question, on one hand you have a guy hell bent on killing an entire ethnic groups in his country, the other no more mass graves filled with those ethnic groups, the Kurds, Shiites ---- or just some one unlucky enough to have crossed paths with one of his sons. I'll take the liberated Iraq.

Answer 4

I don't know lets ask the people, oh never mind about six hundred thousand of them are dead, what do you think? I think bush had a private agenda and he lied to us and the un and went in to do exactly what he is doing right now., raping and stealing and pillaging hell he could have just nuked em . It would have killed alot of people then but not just sacrificed our young people to do it. I don't think that would be alright either., I think he is just an evil man and we are in big trouble.

Answer 5

Depends who you were and where you lived. It is much more dangerous in general. There were no terrorists there before the war, which is good and bad. Trouble is the seeds of future terrorists are being planted in bunches.

Answer 6

One thing they can do now that they couldnot do before. They can speak their mind. We may not like ehat some are saying but at least they can say it without fear of dying. Sadem even helped his uncle take the thrown from his father , then lead the cuop against him to take the country for himself. When his daughters had had enough of him they left. He ordered them home then killed their husbands. Yes they are better off. To THE MASTER; thank your brother for me. I was in the Army for 22 years.

Answer 7

of course it wasnt better. Unless you call under the rule of a mad man killing anyone who opposed him or looked at him the wrong way better. Sadam's sons killed more of his own people then probably we have, and thats not including the ones sadam had killed himself. Iraq is way better now the media just puts a spin on everything to make it look worse. My brother was over there earlier this year and he said the people are happy with the change, and its not as much Iraqies(sp) that are fighting us as much as it is terrorists from other countries.

Answer 8

Water, sewer, power, and sanitation levels still aren't back to prewar levels. Oh, and all the Iraqis that have died since then. Whew, though I was gonna sound like a republican there for a minute.

Answer 9

No Iraq sucked. Its worse than Idaho,

Answer 10

By every objective study YES IT WAS

Answer 11

You would choose a dictator over freedom?