YES!!! I agree with you that it should be a priority, but it wont happen--it would've happened already. If we let him stay after the Florida debacle and the Ohio debacle, they arent going to remove the administration any time soon. Doesnt matter who gets elected. I agree that it could restore confidence around the world, but they already hate us and our arrogance, I dont think much will change that. Will never happen.
2006-11-02 10:03:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I desire it have been available. Bush/Cheney have actually made a large number of usa. international opinion is in basic terms beginning to recuperate now because of the desire interior the coming near election. Obama or Hillary might actually advance our status and effect between something of the international (even nonetheless this is debatable how useful the two may well be). McCain might have a useful consequence besides yet i'm much less specific of that. It relies upon if something of the international sees McCain as a Bush clone or no longer. Bush/Cheney have hundreds of legal experts working for them so i might see it as next to impossible to fee them with a criminal offense interior the subsequent 6 months. until they're hiding something fantastically unlawful this is unexpectedly made public. The gutless Democratic congress can no longer squeeze costs by without Bush veto so as that they gained't have sufficient help to purpose an impeachment. surprisingly because of the fact that Bush/Cheney have not been charged with a criminal offense. permit's anticipate the subsequent president and desire the present possible go away with out doing too plenty extra injury.
2016-11-27 00:13:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The very fact that this administration was gotten out of office through the power of the people should be a prime example to the world that we were able to self govern ,,,, It's just too bad that impeachment proceedings were never started against the blithering idiot we have now ,,,,, but the true leaders of this country are sitting in the shadows ,,,,,, Ever hear of the Secret Society ?,,,,, It's a combination of the corporate sectors and the greater percentage of our political people that rule ,,,,, The better part of our governing body is bought and owned by the corporate sector ,,,,, The power of the dollar is infinite ,,,,,, and most of our political leaders are bought and owned by the big money people ,,,, So our political leaders never make a decision until it is determined how lucrative it will be for themselves first,,,,, every thing that could be said about our present administration could take days at high speed typing to complete ,,,,
2006-11-02 11:50:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it's too late, but, it would be a step in the right direction. I think the Bush administration has done damage to the image of the US, but, it's not the "ability to self-govern"...i don't think that was ever in question. The question is can we prove to the rest of the free world we are willing to finish what we started, even when what we started was a mistake. Terrorist are not a country that can be invaded, liberated, and made into a democracy. The current administrations plan was bad from day one...unless you owned stock in oil companies, defense companies or Haliburton...like the current administration.
More then anything it proves that EVERYTHING can be bought and sold for the right price, even the US presidency. Until the youth of this nation decides to make themselves heard and vote, we will be stuck with the same.
Obama/Springsteen in 08! Feel it!
2006-11-02 10:23:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doctor J. 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
According to the Minority Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, we will not be seeking to impeach. The Democrats do not want to waste time seeking impeachment of a President that will be gone in two years. There are other ways to deal with him when the majority will be Democratic. I agree with that logic. Why tie up so much of their time with impeachment proceedings when they should be spending all of their time dealing with a solution to getting out of Iraq and protecting our own country's weak points - our ports and our borders for example. I agree the man should be impeached, but I think we need to forgo that idea for better use of time to stop his excesses and go-nowhere strategy in their tracks. I think the global populace is aware enough of the politics of America to realize the alternative tactic is a better one.
2006-11-02 11:39:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Go ahead and impeach Bush, morons. If you know the constitution, then you would know that if you impeach Bush, then Chaney takes his spot. If you then decide to impeach Chaney, then you must deal with the second worst female politician in the United States (the first being Hillary) which is Condoleezza Rice. Is that really what you want? Does that really show how great our country, or does it actually show how divided our country really is. Good question dude. I think this shows America's instability to have faith in our leaders, rather than our ability to self govern. You may love to bash our president, who I admit is a poor president, but impeaching him is not the answer. If Democrats could rally together behind one solid presidential candidate, you would have no problem getting your person into the White House. Unfortunately, your candidates are equally as moronic as Bush. Don't believe me. Look at John Kerry's last statement at City College of Pasadena. I still don't understand what he was trying to accomplish in that "joke" gone wrong.
2006-11-02 10:18:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ice 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush has done too many illegal things and taken away too many civil liberties to not be impeached. However, I think it would be a difficult feat to achieve because you have to have 2/3 voting him out. The only issue more pressing than impeaching Bush is getting the troops out of Iraq, but that won't happen until Bush is out of office.
The rest of the world has not respect for Bush and in turn has hardly any respect for Americans because we elected this idiot, not really, the elections were stolen, but that is another story. Also it would show that the American people do not take crap from their leaders, although this should have been done a long time ago.
2006-11-02 10:06:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by fruitcakeweather 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
To say he has done 'illegal things' is wrong. The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the Senate, meaning the infomation that is gathered under that act is 100% legal. And is has worked since we have not been attacked since 9-11, and many attacks were found and disrupted. As for the elections 'stolen', there also is no proof of that. Florida in 2000 was a clear-cut winner and in 2004, Bush won Ohio by more than 100,000 votes (51-49% margin). Even the exit polls show that Bush won Ohio in 2004.
2006-11-02 10:19:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chopper 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Why? Why must we always talk impeachment? I don't get why anyone would wish to waste the taxpayers' money like that. While that money is being spent, the Administration continues to operate under its pre-approved budget, which means we get taxed more for the wasted money! Quit it, already with frivolous talk of wasting my hard earned money!
2006-11-02 10:07:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hey Ice! Third in line for the presidency , is the Speaker of the House. That's why it is so important to keep rep. control! Speaker Pelosi? Yikes!!!!
2006-11-02 10:32:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by JP 2
·
1⤊
2⤋