English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think you should; at the very least we'll prove it's fixed and make it hard for them to deny the fact and win.

2006-11-02 10:00:24 · 2 answers · asked by kasar777 3 in Politics & Government Elections

2 answers

Vote regardless if it fixed or not because your expressing your approval or disapproval of the leading representing you. Your never gonna have 100% clean election with human error factored in. Gerrymandering is good way to fix a election to ensure you get reelected every-time, and computer crash could occur in 2006 but likely 90% of the election results will be clean. The Die-bold Machines only vote for Benedict Arnold like the Princeton study concluded but you should vote anyways because that is what democracy is about.

2006-11-02 10:10:24 · answer #1 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0 0

Normally, if there are only 2 candidates, a Republican and a Democrat, there is no point in voting as both parties are essentially the same. If there is a chance to vote libertarian or for a D or R that truly wants to change things with less government and more freedom, you should definitely vote.
But voting for the lesser of two evils is still an endorsement of evil.

2006-11-02 18:04:21 · answer #2 · answered by debraraj 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers