English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

I give up Mcnabb, Ronnie Brown, and Chris Chambers.

I get Holt, Hasselback (i know he is hurt) and Shaun Alexander (I know he is hurt)

My team goes like this

QB- Vick and McNabb (only start 1)
RB- Cad. Williams, Ahman Green, Ronnie Brown, and Marion Barber III (only start 2)
WR- Berrian, Driver, Evans, Cotchery, Chambers, Bennet (can only start 3)

2006-11-02 09:52:47 · 10 answers · asked by Ben F. 3 in Sports Fantasy Sports

I have a problem because i want to keep McNabb and Vick but i think if i can get Shaun Alexander for later and Holt for know and Hasselback as just a good backup will help me out

2006-11-02 09:57:23 · update #1

10 answers

I would take the trade. I know hasselback and alexander are hurt too, but you have half a season to get plenty of points from both of them.

Personally, I don't really like Chambers or Brown. I had Chambers on a couple of my teams, he didn't produce, and I just plan dropped him to waivers. Brown isn't a bad back, but if you have the option of getting Alexander...even if it's for half a season...take it!!!

If you can start Alexander and Ahman Green on a weekly basis...you're going to have a nice season.

I would go with Berrian, Driver and Cotchery for your WR's too. Evans suffers from Lohsman's inconsistency, Bennett is suffering too, and Chambers is just not putting up enough numbers to warrent starting on a weekly basis.

So, go for the deal. I actually dealt Steve Smith for Alexander a few weeks back...knowing I would be able to make up for the points when Alexander returns...go ahead...make the deal.

2006-11-02 10:16:42 · answer #1 · answered by Kizeman 2 · 0 0

I really don't think that is a bad trade McNabb & Vick play tougher opp. because of the divisions their in. Hasselback would be a good QB to have when he playz AZ,SF. Plus Vick is hot right now but may get cool off.
Alexander will be back next wk vs STL.(LT had 250 Total Yards vs STL)
Holt plays for the Rams they have a QB Miami doesn't. Plus your reciever are not realiable (no offense)

If your willing to lose McNabb for an injured Hasselback then make the trade. Just know that McNabb could have a great Second half when Philly comes off their bye week.

2006-11-02 18:18:46 · answer #2 · answered by youncease 3 · 0 0

do it. you got vick to hold u down for a few weeks until hasselback gets back and then u get alexander who will return soon and then u will have 3 of the top scoring wr in the game. your only real loss is mcnabb and you got another quality QB in vick. Seattle still plays green bay, arizona tampa and san francisco twice. The only good pass defense vick plays against is baltimore so you can count on him to be your starter the way he's playin

2006-11-02 18:19:26 · answer #3 · answered by Jon P 3 · 0 0

I like it. Holt is way better than Chambers this year, Alexander should be better than Brown when he returns and you already have a real solid starter in Vick. Go for it!

2006-11-02 22:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by football fan 2 · 0 0

Its a bad trade

2006-11-02 18:00:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would say that trade is fair, I don't know if I would do it though.

2006-11-02 20:43:08 · answer #6 · answered by Bignizz66 5 · 0 0

You can do a better trade that that.

2006-11-02 19:50:56 · answer #7 · answered by MotorCityMadman 3 · 0 0

No dont do it

2006-11-02 19:16:57 · answer #8 · answered by Robbie D 2 · 0 0

Dont do it.

2006-11-02 18:25:45 · answer #9 · answered by David Patterson 3 · 0 0

dont do it

2006-11-02 17:54:45 · answer #10 · answered by vish 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers