Bush has admitted that there were no WMDs:
In a speech before the World Affairs Council of Charlotte, NC, on April 7, 2006, President Bush stated that he "fully understood that the intelligence was wrong, and [he was] just as disappointed as everybody else" when U.S. troops failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Saddam_WMD_search#Stockpiles_weren.27t_created_post-1991
So it is confirmed that there were no WMDs in Iraq that were the reason we went to war. Weather Bush knew that or not is up for dabate. But if this is the truth, then what do these satatistics say?
Media source, Respondents believing evidence of WMD had been found in Iraq since the war ended
Fox 33%
CBS 23%
NBC 20%
CNN 20%
ABC 19%
Print media 17%
PBS-NPR 11%
Do you think that this says anything about the credability of these new stations? Is Fow News less accurate in their reporting then PBS?
2006-11-02
09:32:55
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Take it from Toby
7
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wmd#Media_coverage_of_WMD
2006-11-02
09:34:09 ·
update #1