um i am just wondering
2006-11-02 08:00:41 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
As of now, despite research, King Arthur, his knights, Excalibur, and Camelot are considered fiction. It is believed that once there may have been an Arthur who was a warlord, who was probably the basis for the first story of King Arthur and the Knights of the Roundtable. There are people (even archeaologists and historians) who believe there may have been a real King Arthur and a true Camelot (and Avalon), but the scientific proof has not been discovered yet.
2006-11-02 08:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excalibur is the mythical sword of King Arthur, sometimes attributed with magical powers or associated with the rightful sovereignty of Great Britain. Sometimes Excalibur and the Sword in the Stone (the proof of Arthur's lineage) are said to be the same weapon, but in most versions they are considered separate. The sword was associated with the Arthurian legend very early; in Welsh, the sword was called Caledfwlch. It is also known as Caliburn but, sadly. it's all part of the legend of King Arthur and only existed in fiction.
2006-11-02 08:19:47 · answer #2 · answered by quatt47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's as real as the holy grail.
2006-11-02 08:08:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋