English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

**also, I am a Christian, I share many beliefs that Republicans share, but I realize the politicians are usually lying to get the poor to middle class Republican's votes. Since Republicans are for the rich, how else could they get poor people to vote for them? I worked 7 years for a hard-core Repulican; he's on the Electoral College in my state, close friends with Roy Blunt & Matt Blunt, has connections with George Bush, and I'm here to tell ya, they are far from Christians!

2006-11-02 07:46:48 · 11 answers · asked by Sunnie 5 in Politics & Government Politics

GERRY K: Let me re-phrase; Republican politicians are generally ONLY for the rich; I think it's nice that you would like EVERYONE to pay lower taxes, be wealthy, etc., unfortunatley, voting Republican will only make the rich richer & the poor poorer, until there is no middle class. So if you really want to be fair, you may want to re-think this a bit more.

2006-11-02 08:13:45 · update #1

GERRY K: Let me re-phrase; Republican politicians are generally ONLY for the rich; I think it's nice that you would like EVERYONE to pay lower taxes, be wealthy, etc., unfortunatley, voting Republican will only make the rich richer & the poor poorer, until there is no middle class. So if you really want to be fair, you may want to re-think this a bit more.

2006-11-02 08:13:46 · update #2

11 answers

hmmm.....don't they have a choice of more then two parties in the u.s,that's called real democracy u know,it does not matter which of the two evils wins both apply the same form of politics.i would agree with you though that the republicans do stand for the rich. (money talks in a capitalist world)

2006-11-02 18:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do not judge anyone by the party they belong to. I have worked for Republican and Democratic presidents - (the last three) and non of the above were worth the paper that the media printed their lies on. I have to say that Bill Clinton and the first George Bush were both the most overated for giving the United States "peace and prosperity" I have ever known....George Bush Senior because he did not kll Sadam and Bill Clinton because of his performance internationally - especially in Serbia.

2006-11-02 07:52:22 · answer #2 · answered by dewar1963 1 · 0 0

politicians are whores and would sell out there own mothers to be elected the choice to be made is this will this whore represent my values better than the other whore? The other question for the less selfish is are my values good for everyone or just people like me? Do my values divide the country as a whole? would it be better to vote for the other guy if that person fought to uphold the constitution instead of my personal values when the two clash?

2006-11-02 07:56:00 · answer #3 · answered by brian L 6 · 0 0

no longer something yet a gaggle of idiots on right here, and until now every person pees there pants I’m a registered self sufficient that a technique or the different seems significant for somebody to communicate now days. First the bill to help the sandy hurricane victims had all style of crap in it from the two components and that replaced into from the 1st weeks after the disaster, yet all that replaced into pulled out and the fuddling replaced into cut back from $60 million to $27 million and nonetheless no vote the Republicans nonetheless blocked it, then as quickly as lower back it went lower back and replaced into broken up or perhaps cut back lower back no longer something replaced into left they broke it up and can piece mill the help to the Sandy victims (how effective of them, to piece out help of the persons’s money this is desperate aside for disaster relief) so Speaker Boehner promised they might vote on the bill until now they broke for Christmas and new year’s ruin, the senate handed the bill it went to the domicile the place Speaker Boehner pulled the bill from the vote saying they did no longer have time, this replaced into 2 months after hurricane sandy. So what did they have time for for the duration of that significant vote that ought to no longer get bumped to help the persons, • Drywall protection • Frank Buckles WWI Memorial • Redesignate Neil A. Armstrong Flight study center and Hugh L. Dryden attempt selection • Conveyance of specific property in Kotzebue, AK All those costs have been deemed extra significant than the persons who % help from hurricane sandy, so then all of the senators went on trip and did no longer look after the bill until ultimately as quickly as they got here lower back.

2016-11-27 00:02:45 · answer #4 · answered by cellar 4 · 0 0

Nice honesty!

Yes, it is true they take advantage of Christians. The Bush administration calls them names in private. There is a book out that illustrates this by a Christian that was involved with Bush's faith-based initiative ploy, but I can't recall the name of the book at the moment. They take advantage of the blind faith that Christians have. It is quite shameful.

Of course its not like the Democrats don't ever lie, to be fair.

2006-11-02 07:49:45 · answer #5 · answered by Believe in Possibilities 4 · 3 0

People who have even less of a life than I do have counted how many times Bush and Clinton have said a religious statement while speaking publicly.

Clinton wins by a landslide.

And how many times did Al Gore go to churches?

2006-11-02 07:59:17 · answer #6 · answered by Mortis 3 · 0 0

Bill Clinton was repeatedly elected to governor and president by espousing his religious beliefs.

During the Lewinsky scandal he was consistently showed going to church with a BIG BIBLE.

Today's Democratic candidates talk about their religious beliefs - especially Tennessee candidate Harold Ford.

2006-11-02 07:49:57 · answer #7 · answered by ABC 3 · 0 0

About this "Republicans are for the rich" comment....aren't the rich citizens too? Why is it so bad for someone to be "for" them?

Besides (and this is my real point), republicans being for the rich does NOT NOT NOT mean we are against the poor or middle class.

I'm for everybody. I'd like EVERYONE to get richer. I'd like EVERYONE to pay lower taxes. I'd like EVERYONE to have a higher standard of living. I'd like EVERYONE to have a better education.

The republican policies have a far greater chance of pulling this off than the let's-regulate-everything, give-the-farm-to-the-poor, welfare-state democratic / liberal policies.

2006-11-02 07:56:17 · answer #8 · answered by Sheik Yerbouti 4 · 0 2

Well, I'm a Republican and I'm an atheist, so I don't vote due to my Christian beliefs.

2006-11-02 07:52:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

amen i finally met an honest republican and christian person amen hallelujah

2006-11-02 08:04:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers