The choices they make affect millions of lives. Still a large number of politicians steal from the people and use their office to secure their own finanicial future. These corrupt heartless ingrates should be lined up and shot. This should also be applied to theft of pentions and annunities. String them up by their toes so we can all beat them to death! Seize all of their assets and sell them to repay the people. Why should they receive mercy, a murderer can destroy one or a couple of families lives while a greedy CEO can destroy thousands of families stealing what they have worked their whole lives to build with one stroke of a pen.
2006-11-02 07:00:12 · 8 answers · asked by feargov 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Wow. What a concept!
When their assets are sold, make sure the money goes to people in their district.
And it would solve the overcrowding in America in the large cities.
2006-11-02 07:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by boo's mom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I agree that corruption in government by whoever happens to be in office should be addressed, and that violators of the terms of said office should be held accountable. I can tell you are very angry, and I don't blame you. But the death penalty is a little harsh, and since all the consequences of these acts affect people indirectly, it would hard to convict someone like that of mass murder. We're getting into logistics here. Neither the death penalty, nor any of the vigilante acts that you describe for retribution, would be appropriate. Otherwise, we wouldn't be much better than they, and we don't want to pull ourselves down to that level. However, these people should be ousted for gross incompetence and not ever again be allowed to hold public office.
2006-11-02 07:10:40 · answer #2 · answered by gldjns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do think they should be severely punished but not the death penalty, heck we don't send most murders to death row and child molesters get hardly any time. They should just take ALL their assets and throw them in prison and not one of the ones that are like country clubs, hard core prisons like the Phoenix, Arizona facilities, tents, no air or heat only the food they grow with the exception of that good ol' green bologna.
2006-11-02 07:09:30 · answer #3 · answered by sharpeilvr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i replaced into watching SABC 2 the morning tutor with Vuyo and the debate they have been having in this difficulty, the Human rights fee is relatively desperate, to the element that they are arranged to circulate to courtroom, to appose this. relatively, there is no study to confirm that the dying Penalty might scale lower back crime. for my area, if i replaced right into a criminal it would make me scared, yet in a justice equipment as ours there are in basic terms too many blunders. think of being incarcerated incorrectly and by skill of a few fault you're given the dying sentence and basically when you lifeless do they comprehend that they had made a mistake. Ouch. as much as I see the reasoning in the back of the help of the dying sentence, i doubt it would artwork as our police tension at the instant are not smart sufficient to competently enforce the regulation. extra desirable regulation ENFORCEMENT (no longer "seen policing") ought to minimise crime.
2016-11-26 23:57:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Murder is the sport of the elected"
-The Police
Both parties are guilty, although whoever is in power at any given moment usually seems worse.
2006-11-02 07:09:16 · answer #5 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And who are you going to get to pass the law?
2006-11-02 07:09:00 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brilliant Idea!! Can you imagine the dead bodies though? There would be so many of them.
2006-11-02 07:02:23 · answer #7 · answered by Loli M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hang the left
2006-11-02 07:02:26 · answer #8 · answered by morts 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋