Luke F:
"On the other hand there are hundreds of reasons why 9/11 could be an inside job. Note that both the NIST and Popular Mechanics Report as well as the 9/11 Commision Report all have dozens of proven inconsistencies. markm, yes I have read that like I said and there are proven inconsistencies, ommisions and distortions. Why don't you do the research and you will find your reference to be a joke."
Is it a joke? who's opinion matters more some conspiracy trolls
on myspace.com and yahoo answers yelling Bush and his Govt planned and executed the murder of 3000 of their own people repeatedly or the expert opinion of 90 Professionals in the Military, Avation, and Engineering field who have credibuility in
what they are saying?!
Add to the fact they have the guy who planned 9/11 Kalid
Shiek Mohammed plus a mountain of evidence siezed in
Afghanistan proving it was Al-Qadea: your ship is sunk.
2006-11-02
06:59:50
·
8 answers
·
asked by
markm
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
We can easily become overwhelmed with all of the "facts" and reports and rhetoric surrounding the events of 9/11. Very few of us have the time to try and prove or disproof every allegation or conspiracy theory that comes along.
And, when the effort is undertaken, it is usually a waste of time because the people who believe these theories simply are blind to any valid facts that refute their beliefs.
So let's take a different approach and use a little common sense:
President Nixon was impeached because he couldn't cover up the theft of some documents from the DNC at the Watergate Hotel in Washington, DC. There were only a few people involved - and the truth was exposed in short order.
Bill Clinton couldn't cover up a little extra hanky-panky in his own office - with TWO people involved - and he was impeached and discraced.
Think of all of the recent scandals that have been exposed - money hidden in freezers, emails to pages, illegal contributions, and so on.
None of these, despite the spinning and vigorous and obvious efforts, were sucessfully covered up.
All of these examples are trivial compared to the events of 9/11 - yet their attemps of a cover up all failed and they were subsequently exposed.
All of these examples were uncovered and exposed, not by rhetoric, lies, web sites and op-blogs, but rather by reporters, independent watch dog groups, the media and people directly or indirectly involved - with verifiable and valid facts. Capital Hill is simply under a 24/7 microscope.
A cover up of the events of 9/11 would necessarily involve an almost infinite amount of details, accomplices, a team of strategists and many years of careful planning - none of which could possibly cover all of the unintended consequences and countless details and the plot would inevitably be exposed.
And that's not even including the improbable silence of literally hundreds or thousands of people "sworn to secrecy."
As you can easily infer, a cover up or conspiracy isn't a very legitimate scenerio - except in the minds of those who simply refuse to accept the events and facts as the true reality.
2006-11-02 07:53:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I have a few higher questions for ALL conspiracy theorists. a million) Who "notably" rigged the three structures with explosives? two) Since it takes approximately three months for a crew to rig a million constructing with explosives for managed demolition, how did the federal government get the team of workers (workforce) to achieve this with out ANYONE, adding constructing safety identifying? three) Who employed the suicide hijackers? What used to be the intent for the hijackers to head at the side of the "plot"? four) How had been the air visitors controllers, constructing safety, demolition workforce, eyewitnesses, and passenger's household all coaxed into going at the side of this "conspiracy"? five) Which aspect of the "govt" used to be concerned? Democrats? Republicans? Or each? If it is only one get together, why is not the opposite get together calling for an research? 6) Why did Osama Bin Laden admit to participating on this? What used to be his intent. 7) Can the conspiracy theorists provide ANY evidence for his or her claims? If so, I could just like the names of no less than five men and women concerned, and the evidence in their aspect. All I desire is evidence, then I will suppose. Somehow I do not suppose I get any evidence. The whole "conspiracy idea" hangs on their "questions". They haven't any solutions. I suppose that men and women must suppose independently. However, accepting "theories" with out info, names, and tough proof isn't clever considering.
2016-09-01 06:09:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What about building 7?
I always start with that, but also there are well over 100 PHD professors in scholars for 9/11 truth. And I can get a list of their names for you. Can you name more than 1 of your government experts? Probably not, because none of them want to put their name on a piece of fiction.
And I am pretty sure you would confess to organizing 9/11 too, if they strapped a car battery to your genitals and didn't stop until you confessed.
2006-11-02 07:07:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jared H 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Most people disagree with u. Why? subconsciously, they refuse to accept the fact that the USA government will do such a thing. I am a loyal American who adores this country and will do anything to defend this country. I love democracy and do not support any act of terrorism. However, I do not trust or agree everything my government does. Knowing Bush and his Neocons, I will not be surprised to know that they allowed terrorists to attack us and they also set up the explosions in those buildings for a perfect demolitions to dramatize the outcome, in order to full fill their evil agenda.
2006-11-02 07:10:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. J 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
If it were a conspiracy; the american people are screwed. Who knows what to believe, especially when we have such a big " liar " sitting in the oval office.
2006-11-02 07:08:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by connie j 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
You should have just asked the question & left the bull for another time.
2006-11-02 07:41:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ChaliQ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Amen brotha.
2006-11-02 07:07:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh yeh, the evidence is just overwhelming...and they had motive and opportunity....it was the US gov that did it.....there's just no doubt.
2006-11-02 07:47:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋