1. everyone will readily agree that, if a govt took 90% of income/wealth permanently off 90% of ppl, & gave it to 1%, violence would dramatically increase [of the order of something like 100x] & social happiness [peace safety law order etc] decrease dramatically [of the order of smthg like 100x]
2. everyone will readily agree that, if a govt, which was doing 1, stopped doing 1, violence wd decrease dramatically [of the order of smthg like 100x] & social happiness wd increase dramatically [of the order of smthg like 100x]
3. we have far more extreme pay/hr range than this [highest pay/hr is a billion times lowest pay/hr, a million times world-avg pay/hr, 225 ppl get as much as 2,500,000,000 ppl]
4. therefore: everyone will agree that violence wd decrease & social happiness increase very dramatically [of the order of far more than smthg like 100x] if the superextreme pay/hr range was dramatically reduced
2006-11-02 06:16:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
And would you agree that point 4 COULD be achieved by killilng everyone who is willing to work for less than the current average wage?
2006-11-02 06:22:06 · answer #1 · answered by Knowledge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
each and every cellular has DNA and that's consisted of two strands tightly woven around one yet another. the element that prevents the two strands from breaking aside is asserted as a telomeric cap (it somewhat is random nucleotide sequences pronounced as nonsense codons. Codon is a three sequence of nucleotides that codes for amino acids eg. CUU is a amino acid pronounced as proline . A nonsense codon is one that doesnt code for any amino acid production) each and every time your cells divide a small sequence is misplaced there by potential of reducing the soundness of the cellular's DNA (in layman's words). this might at last lead do maximum of Ur cells' DNA transforming into to be risky. and regularly whilst a mistake happens in DNA the cellular will carry out vehicle cytolysis (cellular suicide) to dodge problems. So once you're previous maximum of ur cells telomeric caps would be low and that they are companies to die whilst they attempt to divide.. Whats somewhat exciting approximately this thought is the end result it has on evolution (by using fact this occurs on the two meiotic besides as mitotic divisions. by using fact of this a species grows previous too previously it mutates.. yet thats a different tale)
2016-12-28 11:01:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, false premise. The fact that Bill Gates has something like $50 Billion does not affect my life at all.
Without the profit incentive, there is little progress.
Your method is called socialism. It hasn't worked. It never will. Everywhere it's been tried has ended up with the rulers living in luxury and the plebeians living in poverty.
2006-11-02 06:23:37 · answer #3 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's hard to read and understand your typing and rhetoric. But any statement that starts "everyone will agree" is a good way to make people not agree with you. And regular illogical people are part of "everyone".
2006-11-02 06:33:47 · answer #4 · answered by sixgun 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Too much mumbo jumbo to care about reading this question .. blah .. snore. I'll answer : Yes. Bye !
2006-11-02 06:18:33 · answer #5 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
how many people can follow that logic -- well, not me so let's say less than 1%.
2006-11-02 06:28:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is there a question here?
2006-11-02 06:19:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's just socialist commie jibber jabber
2006-11-02 06:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by bgbadwolf27 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess I will place myself in WTF.
2006-11-02 06:19:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋