2006-11-02 05:23:23 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Before I start, this is my opinion and if it offends anyone I am sorry. Freedom of speech and all that.
To be brutally honest, and i know I'm never gonna be popular and influence people, I couldn't stand the woman. Shy Di my lillywhite butt, Sly DI more like it. She did more harm for the royal family than anyone in history. Charles did well to get rid of her, I much prefer Camilla and wish he had married her in the first place. She was no more than a ho with all the blokes she went with. OK Charles had his affair with Camilla but only Camilla, the true love of his life. She manipulated people. How dare she go on national television and give an interview like she did. You don't find Princess Anne (a true Royal) slagging foggy Phillips off do you???
2006-11-03 01:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by tradcobdriver 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know much about this but I have watched a show on video.google.co.uk and they said about the death of Princess Diana. There were two things involved in her accident:" a car and a bike." One of them could be identified till now.
They said the car went upward to Princess' Mercedes and tried to stopped it while the bike went parallelly and did something made the Diana's driver could not focus on driving and he crashed the car into the 13th post. After finding in many months they founded that car which got some evidents of Princess' car but that car's owner was killed and burned till dead in another car which all doors knocked inside.
Co-incidentally, that guy had been to Paris before but he bought a ticket and run away at 3 o'clock on the day Princess died.
That's so strange and till now they have not known the answer yet.
It took two years because after 2 years , not so many people attracted in Princess Diana's death anymore. That why they had to stop the investigation with no hope, I suppose.
2006-11-02 05:43:01 · answer #2 · answered by Ziggy 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the royals and whoever else was involved doesn't want us to know more than they told us- if they push the inquest far enough, those of us that knew the princess may be long gone, and they will be left with our grand kids who wouldn't care less-
So, get the point? They just simply want us to figure it out the hard way- die (of old age), go to heaven/ hell and ask Diana what really happened!
2006-11-02 13:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by BadAss 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Diana was killed by her boyfriend, Dodi's, stupidity. During his elaborate planning of sneaking them out of the Ritz and away from the press, he doesn't notice that his driver is beyond intoxicated? Then in the car he insists on the driver going at speeds that, well, could get people killed knowing Diana had no seat belt on and for what? Because the press wanted some pictures of Diana? Big deal. A few pictures would have been better than her losing her life. Diana's biggest mistake in life was letting men take the lead when she was more than capable of thinking for herself.
2006-11-02 06:14:31 · answer #4 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? Why do we need another inquest anyway, how many ways are there to say 'it was an accident'? If she didn't think she was above the law and had taken 3 seconds out of her life to put on her seatbelt she'd almost certainly be alive along with her bodyguard, the only person in the car to do so.
Conspiracy theories are rubbish, there was a car crash, she's dead, can we move on now please?
2006-11-03 05:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The parties concerned , have to make absolutely sure that they've got their " Cover - Up " story straight, but I agree, Diana should be left in peace now and all this carrying on must be very upsetting for William and Harry.
2006-11-02 12:19:10 · answer #6 · answered by Sierra One 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
organic bred would not propose nicely bred, some runts of the clutter do exactly no longer attain finished improve . There are some traces that have shorter legs and are stockier, some are longer legged and leaner. Many outdoors breeders do no longer breed to the regular, they do no longer learn what stud might paintings with a undeniable female, regularly putting at the same time 2 canines that don't do nicely whilst they produce, the doggies have all their faults and then some.
2016-12-28 10:57:40 · answer #7 · answered by ludwig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suspect the speed or lack of it in getting Princess Diana to hospital is one of the main factors she did not survive the crash, but then the French would have to take part of the blame for her death. Speed, regardless of if the driver was drunk or not is another factor, and the pursuit of the papparizi another....wrong place, wrong time, fate another....there is no one single factor or person responsible for her death, thats obvious without loads of enquiries
2006-11-02 20:59:45 · answer #8 · answered by Breeze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There has been far too many inquiries and rumour mongering already into the death of Princess Diana. We don't need any more.
2006-11-02 05:54:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps since it is such a totally pointless excersize the people on it have better things to do with their time so aren't working too hard.
2006-11-02 05:33:46 · answer #10 · answered by Cheryl M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋