English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OSU vs. U of M for the national championship

2006-11-02 03:54:50 · 11 answers · asked by Greg F 1 in Sports Football (American)

11 answers

Not likely, who would want to see a rematch. Except for the lossers on Nov.18th.

2006-11-02 03:57:49 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Anything is possible remember this is the BCS, it has nothing to do with what is logical or fair. It has nothing to do with what the fans want to see. The Big 12 has had two teams get blown out in their own conference (Nebraska and Oklahoma) and still make the BCS championship. Both teams were not surprisingly blown out.

So I would say Michigan - OSU rematch has a real good chance of happening because it makes little sense and most fans don't want a rematch. ha could you imagine a remtach in the NFL

2006-11-02 07:54:33 · answer #2 · answered by Bruce Tzu 5 · 0 0

Not likely at all. Now if OSU and Michigan would've played earlier in the season, possibly. The only people that would want to see such a BCS championship are Big Ten fans. I think even the coaches polls and the Harris Poll would have enough bias in them to not let this happen as well.

2006-11-02 04:14:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The only way that I could see it happening is if they played to a tie, and Michigan won in overtime. Then Louisville would need to lose to Rutgers, and Rutgers lose to WV. Michigan and OSU are so far ahead of everyone else in the BCS right now, that the loser on the 18th might squeak by. If one of the Big East teams (Louisville or Rutgers) stays undefeated, they are starting to get respect from the pollsters, and would probably rise above the Mich/OSU loser.

2006-11-03 02:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by stumpyv 2 · 0 0

Not going to happen.

Like it or not, and I don't, if the Big East champ runs the table they go.

Now, if it comes down to Ohio St and a bunch of 1 loss teams there would only be 2 logical choices. There would only be two 1 loss teams whose only loses were to the #1 team in the country. Michigan, and they lost to late in the year so the human polls would drop them to far to stay at #2 in the BCS. There would only be one other logical choice:

A Texas/Ohio St rematch in the desert for all the marbles.

Hook'em!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Colt's not a freshman anymore.

If Michigan beats Ohio St then this thing really gets screwed up.

2006-11-02 04:17:36 · answer #5 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0 0

Ohio State is going to have a no longer hassle-free time even making it to the national Championship activity. First, they should make it previous USC, meaning they are in a position to have one much less Kent State on the schedule to pad the numbers with. massive Ten soccer - evidence that some faculties have not gotten previous the "3 yards, and a cloud of airborne dirt and dirt" offensive plan.

2016-11-26 23:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If OSU loses then it's likely since they KOed Texas, but that would mean Louisville would have to beat WVU and lose or play crappy down the stretch. It'll be an exciting finish!

2006-11-02 04:20:15 · answer #7 · answered by nflterry 2 · 0 0

0%, because either Louisville or WVU, probably the latter, is going to run the table and I think an undefeated team will edge the loser of the OSU-Michigan game.

2006-11-02 05:27:39 · answer #8 · answered by Virgil M 1 · 0 0

I don't think it will happen. If Michigan loses, Texas could make the argument they they deserve it too. I think two unbeaten teams deserve to play more then one unbeaten, and a team they already beat.

2006-11-02 04:06:51 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

none. It would be disaster for the title game TV ratings and FOX network would never let it happen.
It's about $$$$ folks.

2006-11-02 09:44:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers