Hypocrites?
2006-11-02 03:10:44 · 14 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Democrats hate any one who doesn't share their point of view, which is strange because they really don't have a point of view that stays constant.
2006-11-02 03:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by only p 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Speaking for myself, I appreciate it when celebrities use their ability to reach large numbers of people to speak out about something in the government that is not right. We should all do that to the extent that we can. But you would have to give me specific examples, then I would decide if I agree.
Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly are not comparable, because their rhetoric is very well planned and well rehearsed- they are not coming from an honest or heartfelt place because it is their JOB to support one side, and put down the other, no matter what the truth is. If you think about it, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle.
As American citizens, we cannot allow ourselves to get caught up or brainwashed by one-sided, hate filled rhetoric. If you believe everything one person, or one group, or one party says, you are not thinking for yourself.
2006-11-02 03:30:56 · answer #2 · answered by catarina 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The reason the Democrats' policies change a lot is because they are constantly thinking. Also, Bill O'Reilly is NOT liberal!
And RKO, the Democrats are the ones that think. The Republicans are the big "follow-the-leader" group. That's why there are so little vetos when the Republican party is up. They are all the same.
2006-11-02 03:19:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because what emanates from the mouths of Limbaugh and O'Reilly bears a striking resemblance to the substance that comes out of your ***.
fas‧cism
- a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
lib‧er‧al‧ism
– a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.
2006-11-02 03:30:07 · answer #4 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rush
2016-05-23 16:59:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a fair and balance view; both parties have their celebrates and talk show host to project their agenda. However; what fails to be comprehended is that this is America; and each citizens has the right to vocalize their opinion; no matter how much we may disagree. As much as I disagree with the talking points of the KKK; I defend their freedom of speech, to protect my own!
2006-11-02 03:17:35 · answer #6 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Another generalization with no intelligences. Can you say Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger a outspoken celebrity. Rush is out of touch with the middle class and O`Reilly just had a mean dad and is taking it out on the world like most Republicans.
2006-11-02 03:18:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because the "outspokenness" of both Limbaugh, and O'Reilly can best be described as specious, phoney, and self serving.
2006-11-02 03:17:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
There is a difference about being outspoken about politics, and merely dealing with invective and diatribe.
For example, I have no idea who Rosie O'Donnell speaks for, but she deals in invective and diatribe
2006-11-02 03:13:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bill O'Reilly is a liar. That's why.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_O%27Reilly_controversies
This is a good source for some of his more famous lies.
2006-11-02 09:45:38 · answer #10 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The same shoe fits both side's. No one likes to be disagreed with.
2006-11-02 03:23:22 · answer #11 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋