2006-11-02 01:26:21 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
You cant beat seeing a decent film on the big screen. Even widescreen tvs cant compete.
Besides, I like overpriced pop corn and drinks that come in cups the size of a barrel!
2006-11-02 01:30:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather watch films at home, cinema is a waste of time and money
2006-11-02 01:28:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends on the film but yes it has got so expensive to go and watch a film in the cinema.
2006-11-02 01:30:16 · answer #3 · answered by lucylou198 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like seeing films but here in London you can pay up to £17 for a ticket to see a film in the Odeon Leicester Square. Then you have to take out a small bank loan to pay for the drinks and popcorn. However much money I have in my hand at those tills it's never enough!
2006-11-02 01:47:09 · answer #4 · answered by Carrie S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes in the cinema it is a waste of money and time. At the house it is nice sometimes. I would rather do other things though.
2006-11-02 01:38:57 · answer #5 · answered by joe d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no (although anything can be done to excess, eh?).
The Psychology of Filmwatching must be a fascinating study.
Above entertainment, it can be stimulating and healthy to imagine ourselves in the roles of the characters we view. For some, it's their first experience with empathy.
I read once of how valuable soap operas were for elder, bed-ridden patients. They had few/no visitors and little activity and contact with others (outside of nursing staff). By viewing soap operas, they 'got outside themselves' and experienced various emotions and mental processes, thus adding a measure of vitality (so to speak) to their lives.
Who suggested movies are a waste of time? Toss popcorn at 'em. Indeed!
And I'll tell ya' something else: I'm adding "loves to view and discuss films" to my list: Qualities I Want in a Mate.
2006-11-02 01:37:53 · answer #6 · answered by Zeera 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Arrrh, sacrilege! Cinema is the only art form with any life left it in. Apart from TV, it's the one and only medium that millions of people access every week. Long live the movies!
2006-11-02 01:58:09 · answer #7 · answered by bingo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
potential What an overrated piece of crap. have been given it incorrect lower back Rolling Stone magazine "maximum suitable action image of 2011", as though. i circulate to admit the cinematography replaced into great, in spite of the undeniable fact that the story replaced into bleh. that's what occurs mutually as your director makes a action image approximately driving and does no longer have a licence. I watched a desirable Indy flick pronounced as Lbs (as in kilos) it replaced into particularly sturdy. The finishing wasn't incredibly satisfied or unhappy, even nonetheless very actual. With the present weight concerns (and different addictions) in united statesa. suitable now I felt it replaced into very appropriate to correctly-widespread society. a minimum of contained interior the U.S.
2016-11-26 23:29:36 · answer #8 · answered by combes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah most films are so mundane.I prefer the old fashioned ones with a good old story line.
2006-11-04 00:46:55 · answer #9 · answered by JULIA E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the movie. with all the crap that come out these days it does feel like a wast of time
2006-11-02 01:29:31 · answer #10 · answered by need to know 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋