US and the entire world is aware that Pakistan is responsible and/or very much involved in the terrorist activities in Kashmir and India - but they do not say it openly. US is playing the double game of maintaining friendly relations with India and at the same time it does not want to hurt Pakistan. They need Pakistan's active support for their highhandedness in Iraq and Afghanistan. Why UN is a silent spectator. When US bombarded Iraq, why no one has questioned ? Is it that US is a super power ? India can only solve all these instabilities by becoming itself a powerful country - not by mite but by spiritualism. I wish that all the spiritual leaders in the country should now make vigorous efforts to turn our politicians and reform their minds so that the party in power can bring universal peace. India should ask Pakistan to vacate its illegal occupied Kashmir before going for any peace talks with them.
2006-11-01 22:02:51 · 11 answers · asked by scr p 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
fot getting back, the occupied kashmir, India needs, PM like J. BUSH.
2006-11-01 22:26:03 · answer #1 · answered by s m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At the time of getting independence india was not one union but a federation of princely states, british controlled territory, and states oweing allegience to the british. At the time of independence, Kashmir was under the rule of Hindu Dogra Kings but the majority of the population was muslim. While the king could not make up his mind on whether to join india, remain independent or join pakistan, the Pakistani Army invaded Kashmir and the king signed an instrument of accession to india with some special privileges. But by the time the Indian Army could respond to the invasion of Kashmir by Pakistan about 1/3 of the territory of Kashmir was already occupied by Pakistan. The UN intervened to avoid a full scale conflict between india and pakistan and the line of actual control has since become the defacto boundary between india and pakistan. India and Pakistan have since fought 3 wars over Kashmir, all of which have been won by India and as a consequence Bangladesh or East Pakistan became liberated and became an independent nation with the support of Indian Army.
2006-11-01 22:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by Pramod R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kashmir issue has been kept in the box aside for a very longtime.
I think it should have been taken care during the previous wars, when we got a chance.
But thanks to our great politicians who only cared about the relations with other great countries.
On the other hand US making money, by selling figther jets & ammunitions.
U cannot solve a problem by spiritualism, u cud only find ways, or answers.
At the end of the day one needs to take action, to solve a problem.
UN is nothing, it was created by US & is controlled by US.
I don't think US had enough material proof to bombard Iraq.
Where India is concerned it has always turned a blind eye.
2006-11-01 22:48:32 · answer #3 · answered by ambitiousjay 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who the hell told you that India allowed illegal occupation!!!
The Pakistani army and tribals INVADED the then dogra kingdom in Jammu and Kashmir. They were niether Indian nor Pakistani. Dogra king tried to fight the pakistani invaders, but kept losing. Asked India for help, India refused stating first Kashmir needs to be part of India.
Under pressure of losing his kingdom to Pakistanis, the king signed the instrument of accession. Indian Army moves in and saves the day, but before they can finally kick out the pakistanis out of all of Kashmir, Nehru goes to UN (cannot to the life of my understand why) and UN calls for ceasefire. Indian Army halts its advance and so whereever they stopped became the BORDER, that is LINE OF CONTROL.
Nehruvian policies and then congress policies kept the Indian Army on leash in 65 and 71, and Vajpayee held the leash tightly in 99 from taking over POK.
SO, there you have it now. Everybody knows what to do and how to do it, but nobody wants to take the headache.
2006-11-02 21:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by Ramy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like many disputed territories, Kashmir is an accident, and its people victims, of history.
No use using hindsight and blaming everybody else. Sovereignty is outside the limit of democracy. And what happened to Kashmir -- and indeed to Pakistan and to Bangladesh, are among the unintended consequences of political and diplomatic actions that may have seemed reasonable at the time.
2006-11-01 22:08:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Quite an observation. You are right, spiritual leaders should unite and do something about it.
2006-11-01 22:48:01 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because Pandit Nehru was a coward,selfish person who allowed bangladeshi(east pak)insurgence in assom and west bengal,just to become popular in muslims and for vote politics.
2006-11-01 22:35:32 · answer #7 · answered by viresh s 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
U know India is planning to put a bomb on pakistn
2006-11-01 22:48:40 · answer #8 · answered by Mohomad Hafeez 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
KASHMIR IS PART OF INDIA AND POK THEY HAVE GIVEN UNDER THE WRONG POLICIES OF OUR LEADERS.
2006-11-01 23:49:09 · answer #9 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because both are very liberal, if i am in charge of my Mahabharata, i will order my army chief to take over POK IMMEDIATELY. BHANU RAVAL, USA.
2006-11-02 08:52:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋