NO!!
My little boy is mine, and nobody could give him a better life then his mummy...
His future will shine anyway - he is a handsome lad with a great personality, and he doesn't need famous connections to get him where he wants to be!!!
We've got enough money to give him a good life without lacking anything - as much as any child needs and wants.
Theres nothing like a mother's love!
;-)
2006-11-01 21:18:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Krissyinthesun 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Angelina Jolie
2006-11-01 20:53:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by cat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a chance in hell. Sure they'd have all the money and the best of everything, but when it comes down to it, my kids aren't going to grow up with their heads in the clouds, looking down on everyone else, and being constantly put under a microscope by the press. My kids are (so far) turning out to be happy, contented, well rounded individuals. And that suits me just fine.
2006-11-01 21:09:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tish P 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
My child is precious to me, and no amount of money could buy her!!!!!!! She is 18 and in college and has a job. She has a mother who loves her and would give her the world. No person could replace me and we have a bond that goes deep.
As for the 2 you mentioned, they are perfectly capable of having their own children, both have given birth...........
As for a better life, my child may not have been born with a silver spoon in her mouth, but she was given love, education, morals, religion, family values, a home, clothing, food, trips, fun, friends, I think that is a pretty good life.........Who could have given her more? Possibly turned her into a spoiled rotten excuse for a human who has no idea what it is to have to work for things....
Please, someone help me down from this soap box........
2006-11-01 21:33:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jazzys_mom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a child is old enough to recognize his or her own name, then in my opinion, you shouldn't change the name. The exception, of course, is for an older child who wants her name changed on adoption.
2016-05-23 13:18:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't let either of them. The love you have for a child is more than anything in the world and I'd let no-one take that away from me. Not if they're famous, not if they're poor.
2006-11-01 20:55:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What would happen if my kid found out that i rejected her and gave it to some rich lady.. It would be pretty sad and why would I give it to them when I'm not poor?
2006-11-01 21:49:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lyrical Lie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No neither of them. I'll keep what's mine. Wouldn't sale or give my child to anyone. I had them
2006-11-01 21:42:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
think not coz even though they'd have a comfortable and luxurious life, they won't grow with their parents' love and feelings.. it's always nice to have an offspring with their parents.. but if i and my son would be invited, then why not? i'd be there for my son...
2006-11-01 21:17:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by GeLo'14 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No chance in hell. My child would be white so they wouldn't want to adopt him/her anyway.
2006-11-02 00:16:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋