English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or is it the other richest people? Or is this all just another conspiracy theory based on an actual secret society from centuries ago that has since disbanded?

2006-11-01 20:31:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

The qualification for being a member of the Illuminati is not wealth.
In fact, it is more related to blood lines. Wealth arises as a result of Illuminati activities. As far as I am aware, Bill Gates does not belong to an Illuminati blood line, and has not been through their initiation programs like Skull and Bones etc.

The so-called disbanding of the Illuminati never really took place. They just became more secretive, and therefore to unknowing eyes, disappeared.

2006-11-03 17:03:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Skull & Bones, Freemasons, Illuminati, The Committee of 300. All very much alive and very much in business. Coincidentally GW Bush had to resign his post on the Trilateral Committee in order to become President. Do a bit of research and prepare yourself for a shock.

2006-11-01 20:39:12 · answer #2 · answered by dingdong 4 · 1 1

Look, all evidence that I have, and I've researched this heavily, is that the "Illuminati" never existed. If you wanna get philosophical about this they didn't actually rule the world, but more were considered the executors of it. That means they were holding it for something or someone else.

2006-11-01 21:13:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have no information about Gates, But if is is dead it has died since Ted Turner got out of college, as he did belong to the Illuminati, when he graduated, I don't feel it is dead maybe more invisible,

2006-11-01 20:45:47 · answer #4 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0 1

What are you talking about? The world is ruled by judges.

"Whosoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the lawgiver, for all intents and purposes, and not the one who first wrote or spoke them." -- Bishop Hadley, the year 1717.

2006-11-01 21:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

agree with dingdong,

2006-11-01 20:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers