Simple answer: patriarchy.
2006-11-01 18:39:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by coreyander 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because the word "man," if you do a little research on the English language, is just the basic root word for the human race. Males are the dominant gender, the leaders of humanity; of course, you wouldn't hear that nowadays.
2006-11-02 03:45:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Leroy Johnson 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Man is a generalization of the human race. Woman are so special we get a name all to ourselves :0)
2006-11-02 02:31:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
simple when u kill a man it is killing of species or a human bieng and it applies for both woman or man so question of woman slaughter doesnt arise second no human being can think of slaughtering a woman keepin in mind that she has been created as a beautiful flower for a man so one sane person can think of slaughtering a woman.
2006-11-02 02:30:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by ravishr 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because man is intended to include both - MAN and woMAN. As in HuMAN? OK? So chill.
2006-11-02 02:29:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
contraction of huMAN or MANkind or even woMAN or MAN. It covers all bases.
2006-11-02 04:37:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike J 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose if you want to be politically correct, it should actually be "person-slaughter."
2006-11-02 02:38:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by crowbird_52 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
man refers to "mankind"
2006-11-02 02:28:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by cork 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
2006-11-02 02:27:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋