Sometimes, the Good Questions are Best Never Asked?

Question

Some schools of thought go as far as that thinking and enquiry should never stop but be a continuous process.

Universally or Otherwise, will you consider investigation and revelation of fact and truth necessary before all other considerations ?


Illustrations or examples are appreciated in supporting your position, from the Philosophical perspective.
Ambiguity is seldom purposeful. Thank you.

Underlying tone so far
- Truth and revelation be revealed regardless the cost;
- Empricism, rational and literal interpretation of modern philosophy is the only acceptable means of enquiry; Art is not.

Answer 1

a matter of opinion and so who decides who the judge is ?
if I were the judge I would think after you broke off from your question you went to bovine fecal matter for an argument .
ambiguity seems like your best friend so do you think this is a good or bad question you have posed ? dialectical thinking is often vague and obscure to me ....fact in truth help but parallels and pictures often mislead as apples and oranges .

peace out my friend

Answer 2

Investigatin facts, yes. Because it would be naiive to just accept ideas as being presented to you. There are times when it would be acceptable not to investigate theories if ones sixth sense feels strongly about making a conclusion based on general knowklege, common sense & previously investigated theories which may have been proven with results.

Answer 3

To blindly accept anything without thought and investigation breeds ignorance. That's why philosophy, morals, ethics, and laws exist...because we as humans are naturally curious and sometimes that curiosity leads to trouble and other times great revelation and innovation.

Answer 4

Ask questions which challenge your intellect - that is enough.

Answer 5

try to have an open mind...I know that things change....circumstance,people,places,things etc....