English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In a free society, can the government legitimately argue that they have the power to protect people from harming themselves, such as with drugs, suicide, prostitution, ect, as long as they are not harming others(directly anyway)?

2006-11-01 15:10:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

By harming others, i mean direct physical harm.

2006-11-01 15:14:28 · update #1

8 answers

if that is true, there is no free society. in a free society, people have a right to choose, but the government should inform the people of what is expected of them, not imposed on them.

2006-11-01 15:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 0 0

Each one of those examples can be argued with. With each example you listed the people will not only be harming themselves but others as well. There is no way to avoid that.

Drugs- it is a fact that drug users are more likely to commit a crime while under the influence... drugs generate violence.

Suicide- Nothing within our legal traditions or historical practices supports a right to die. The state has a compelling interest in preserving human life in preventing suicide in any form. In committing suicide one is not only harming them selves but also their family and friends. Perhaps they are not PHYSICALLY harmed but definitely emotionally.

Prostitution- Let me just give you three letters and I am sure you can figure it out on your own: STDs. Not only are they infecting themselves but their "clients" as well...




We give up our freedom to be protected.

2006-11-01 15:54:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The government job is only to protect the super rich and the head of
large corporations. Are military, CIA, NSA,FBI and Justice Department are the special protection arm used againist american
citizens and not for them. We have been fooled into beleiving we
have law enforcement for the people. Wake! up America law enforcement is to enslave us.

2006-11-01 15:14:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Politics makes for unusual propaganda. contained in u.s. communism has ruled using fact the traitor Ron Wilson Reagan bought u.s. for an even bigger bag of dope. He married a traitor, Nancy Reagan, who replaced into favourite to be a Communist agent, yet an incredible lay. considering the fact that that day, Ron replaced into very disillusioned being an American.So he nevertheless and he theory, how do I pervert u.s., so we are able to kill 20 % of our inhabitants, like Mao is doing to China? you notice all he had to do replaced into please Nancy, the consummate traitor. He desperate that the U. S. shape replaced into incorrect. He made up a formulaic chant that purposely attacked u.s. for protecting itself, by capacity of coaching it incredibly is babies in faculties. He did no longer purchase the Liberal Argument that the form helps united states functioning armed forces. He fought valiantly for years to undo our united states with this vainglorious "psychiatric argument": "using fact the U. S. shape would not enable the country to guard itself by capacity of education it incredibly is babies utilising tax funds, because it is redistribution of wealth, each and every American that helps such treason is a tax kleptomaniac." The he study the Soviet shape. And he got here to the comparable end approximately them. in spite of the indisputable fact that it dawned on him: "people like to hate the Soviets". So he ran for place of work in 1980 on the platform that if elected he might substitute issues. HE might GET IT a remember OF regulation that all and sundry those that help THE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH ~ like the SOVIETS ~ while THEIR CONSTITUTIONS do no longer enable THIS, TO BE considered INSANE. thus he have been given ninety 9.ninety 8% of u.s. to be considered insane. As area of the emergency protocols progressed interior the chilly conflict, while great numbers are considered insane, humane medical care would not incorporate telling them of their ailment. One in basic terms treats the ill. So, they have been given to handle ninety 9.ninety 8% as though they have been insane. And as such, does no longer telling us they have us by capacity of the b@lls be all that smart? No, they are spies. And spies do no longer tell while they have ALL yet gained. THEY LIE. AND WHAT DO THEY LIE approximately? WHO THEY HATE !

2016-10-21 03:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

YES!!!
With us doin it others will think its also right they will follow our foot step n plus all these things arent the answer to all instead it makes family members filled with sorrow and friends

2006-11-01 15:14:12 · answer #5 · answered by tiffany l 1 · 0 0

The Government should not have that sort of Control!

I

2006-11-01 15:13:42 · answer #6 · answered by lancelot682005 5 · 0 0

I prefer for that to be up to my family and other loved ones.

It would be hard to say that they wouldn't be harming others.

2006-11-01 15:12:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

NO, it is not the govt. job

2006-11-01 15:12:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers