First and foremost, I am "for" the United States. I am sick and tired of the partisan bickering. I support our President wholeheartedly, which doesn't necessarily mean I agree with absolutely everything he does, but he has my respect and support. Bush is a decent man. Kerry, on the other hand, is an egg sucking dog.
2006-11-01 13:49:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by fearslady 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Against both!!
God I hope people arent insinuating that Kerry could be a candidate AGAIN.... oh jeez... please no...
Definately against Bush for all of the obvious reasons... not to mention I'm onto his globalization scheme for the north and south american continents ;p and simply believe that the American people should be aware of this simply becasue.... well they should.... he is weak on immigration in reality and talks as if he isnt to get votes... this is all because the issue will not be an issue in the future... the man is very irresponsible... he doesn't care about the common man or what pleases America. He thinks the Constitution is only a piece of paper and believes running America would be easier if it was a Dictatorship. I also never liked Clinton and am tired of hearing everything being blamed on him... Really I think in the long term both parties want to work towards certain goals that America in general is unaware of and should be more aware of and concerned about.
2006-11-01 21:50:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm for Bush mainly because I've got more money in my pocket due to his tax reform, very low unemployment, all time high stock market, cheaper gas, no terrorist attacks since 9/11, and his steadfast resolve to not bow down to terrorism.
I'm against Kerry because I've got more money in my pocket due to the Bush tax reform which resulted in low unemployment, an all time high stock market, and cheaper gas. Plus I like that the Bush policies have resulted in no terrorist attacks since 9/11 and he has a steadfast resolve to not bow down to terrorism. As a veteran I was also very insulted my Kerry's recent remarks about how stupid we are. John I'm sorry we veterans mostly served because we did it from a sense of obligation to our country instead of being a silver spooner who used his military service as a right to jump up on his left wing soap box.
Get real America. Why do you think such a "highly" decorated vet such as Kerry can't get the support of the rest of us vets?
2006-11-01 21:54:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Keith 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't think I could be more against Bush and his policies. Kerry screwed up and yes, I believe he meant to skewer the President and not the soldiers. But now it is open to interpretation, and everyone feels one way or the other about it. It will just be another arguing point when his name comes up in the future. I can't imagine him running for the office again, and I don't think he should.
2006-11-01 21:45:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well this will be easy, were for Bush because he is the President Of The United States Of America, were against Kerry because he's a east coast Massachusetts loonie elitist liberal that talks through his nasal passage, and assumes everyone is dummer than him :) There hows that?
2006-11-01 21:44:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I support Kerry in this week's ridiculous affair. He may have slightly mangled a jab at Bush (it was at Bush, not our troops--he said "get us stuck in Iraq," not "get stuck in Iraq."). Both men like anyone under the public eye will stumble in speech patterns at times, but Bush is clearly a dishonest, unethical man who took us into Iraq on lies to get some vengeance for his father and to fatten the pockets of his buddies (Halliburton is the most familiar of these). I once thought Nixon was our worst president in modern times. Bush has displaced him.
2006-11-01 21:49:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by kennethmattos 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
The honest one.The one who has fought for his country. The one who is humble enough to admit he has made a mistake. The one who can read and speak correctly. The one who did not lie to his country and started a personal war. I guess that would be Kerry and not Bush Wacko.
2006-11-01 21:47:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by RORO 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would have to say Bush out of those 2. Kerry too busy insulting the intelligence of others, But do you think his comments are intelligent?
2006-11-01 21:51:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
this is a tought question i am not a total bush backer but the thought of Kerry as the leader of the greatest country in the free world in the times we are having right now is a nightmare that i don't think i would want to live.
2006-11-01 21:44:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by blkbelt 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
I realize that Kerry was tossing out jokes BUT the joke about education and avoiding the military was not only was delivered wrong but just bad. I think Kerry should appologize for the mistake...fess up to it. Instead he goes on the attack.
Dude, you screwed up a joke.....deal with it.
2006-11-01 21:42:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pam 3
·
2⤊
3⤋