Who would Fox Rupert Murdoch support if Laura Bush ran against H. Clinton for President in 2008?
He did fund raising for H. Clinton already
2006-11-01 13:16:02 · 10 answers · asked by Taco 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
oh! and who is a better mom?
who has drunk daughters?
2006-11-01 13:22:27 · update #1
Not just drunks but drunks that are repeat offenders immune to prosecution.
2006-11-01 13:24:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rupert supported Hillary? Really, thats quite a news for me. Well, guess fox will support hillary then huh? Oh well, I guess i'll support Hillary then. She's smarter and a career woman. Laura is a housewife so i cannot trust her in office.
2006-11-01 21:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by savio 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Americans should forget all about these money grubbing, power hungry people who are aiming for the position; it's bulls*** and they already have an agenda and ties to a bunch of unscrupulous power players already. Elect an Average Joe (or Jane) for President. You don't need a law degree or a military ranking to be President; all you need is to be 35+ and a born citizen of the United States. Oh- and some plain old common sense is a great asset, too.
2006-11-01 21:28:02 · answer #3 · answered by Flea© 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who cares, really? If Laura Bush ran and actually won that means GW would return to the area. The better question is would anyone want that?
2006-11-01 21:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Linda L 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your first question is simple... Laura is smarter: She didn't marry an adulterous lecher (Hillary denied her lesbianism to ride Bill's coat-tails) and she doesn't seek election to public office.
That answers question two... Laura wouldn't run in 2008.
Mr. Murdoch is a simple corporate media whore.. he'll support who ever he can buy... so he gives money to both parties.
2006-11-01 21:32:57 · answer #5 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm, a woman who seemingly has nothing to say except smile and stand by her man - or someone who works hard and tries to carve out her own identity in the world... Go Hilary!
2006-11-01 21:25:19 · answer #6 · answered by yundo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Laura Bush may or may not be smarter than Hillary, but she's not as ruthless as Hillary. In the end, ruthlessness is what counts when it comes to obtaining power.
2006-11-01 21:24:04 · answer #7 · answered by trafficer21 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Laura Bush is vacuous. She doesn't have enough sense to have an original thought.
That is why she stands behind, and slightly to the left of GW.
2006-11-01 21:19:03 · answer #8 · answered by Blim 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who cares who is smarter. What the stand for and their morals are what count. I personnally would vote for laura. But she is not going to run. She is not obsessed with power.
2006-11-01 21:19:34 · answer #9 · answered by just curious 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its not that hard to be smarter than hillary clinton...
2006-11-01 21:24:39 · answer #10 · answered by Tommy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋