if america occupied your country, you will resist it, or you will keep silent to not be terrorist?

Answer 1

Turn it around.
If another country occupied America, would YOU resist it.
I think you have an understanding of what is happening. Anyone working for the coalition is not a terrorist, even if they terrorise whole nations. Anyone defending their own nation is a terrorist.
That is the slant that government propaganda puts on things.
The only REAL terrorists ARE the American Government, and especially the secret services.

Answer 2

You're oversimplifying the matter a little bit.

There is a power struggle going on in Iraq. There are different political, ethnic and religious groups who hate each other with an intensity far stronger than their hatred for Saddam.

Sure, most Iraqis are thrilled that Saddam is gone. But they're not thinking about that right now. They're thinking about the future, a future in which their enemies may be taking over their own country. Keeping silent is simply not an option. If they don't seize power now (so they probably think), then their rivals will.

If I were a Sunni, I would be terrified to realize that sooner or later American forces are going to leave. Then the Shi'ite majority will take over the country. I would want to take power for my group before America hands it over to people who want to destroy me!

Answer 3

Ask the Kurds. They have been freed from the possibility of Saddam wiping them all out like Hitler vs. the Jewish people. I think they are pretty happy that the USA showed up.

Answer 4

It isn't being a terrorist to defend your own country.

Answer 5

Nope, i urge to selection that it will fee them no longer something. in this occasion, the blend of Palestinians into different muslim international places is extra of an economic, social, and administrative hassle on the different hand than to do with faith. working example, the mass influx of Palestinans into one extra u . s . might require the federal government in element out to grant for the beginners, which might fee many hundreds or billions because of the fact that maximum Palestinians are #a million undesirable #2 uneducated. This, many governments at the instant are not waiting to do because of the intense fee, that would finally be borne by skill of skill of taxpayers. what number governments might probability the compromisation of inner protection and social unrest among their people (tax will enhance you spot) to maintain foreigners? besides integration of Palestinians into distant places lands could be a difficulty provided that they might compete with locals for jobs/land/wells and a great sort of others, which perchance might consequence in a anti-Palestinians revolt interior the close to destiny? For any govt interior the international, Islamic or now no longer, the welfare of their persons comes first, accompanied by skill of utilising the welfare of friendly states. Why else might Iran no longer deliver volunteers now to combat Israel below the Hamas banner, in spite of the undeniable fact that deliver weapons on the different hand? Many muslim countries have a low in line with capita GDP while in comparison with the west, which has a greater potential to grant for immigrants. additionally, i do no longer think the Palestinians might % to to migrate to a minimum of one extra u . s ., for in this occasion, nationalism and national satisfaction is at artwork, they generally % a Palestinian place of start for themselves, no longer go away for a distant places u . s . to stay, for this to them may well be the reality that Israel has victory over them.

Answer 6

Put it in context.

If the leader of my country was a mass murderer and his sons routinely kidnapped our daughters from the street and, after they pleasured themselves, simply had them killed - well, I think I would welcome the change.

Given the chance to form a government that answers to the people instead of the other way around - yeah, I would welcome the liberators.