what would happen if someone took clomid without a doc and just took it would she still ovulate?

Question

just curious would it work or not? what if she never gets her period and she just took it would it do anything?

Answer 1

no one needs to take clomid without being under doctor supervision. the clomid can cause cysts on your ovaries, sometimes getting as large as a grapefruit. please be careful, because ovarian cysts are very painful.

Answer 2

You could just try the lowest dose -- 50mg -- and see what happens. No telling if you will ovulate or not, you don't know until you try, even with a doctor.

I don't understand why you are so reluctant to see a doctor. Even your OB/GYN can run a basic blood panel and order an HSG and a semen analysis for your husband. You should get the basic diagnostic tests and let a doctor counsel you on next steps. It may very well be clomid but why not do it under supervision? If you don't get the tests done you could just be wasting more time -- for example if your tubes are blocked or if your husband's SA is just dismal, clomid is not going to help you.

Answer 3

it is not because you need doc to prescribe it for you to ovulate
the problem is the side effect
you need to follow up with a doc
that is very important
please check the web for Clomid

Answer 4

(a) Whoever, interior the particular maritime and territorial jurisdiction of america, has the point to seize a picture of a private component to somebody without their consent, and knowingly does so below circumstances wherein the guy has a sensible expectation of privateness, would be fined below this call or imprisoned no greater desirable than 12 months, or the two. (b) in this area— (a million) the term “seize”, with admire to a picture, potential to videotape, photograph, movie, checklist via any potential, or broadcast; (2) the term “broadcast” potential to electronically transmit a seen photograph with the point that that's seen via a individual or persons; (3) the term “a private component to the guy” potential the bare or undergarment clad genitals, pubic section, buttocks, or lady breast of that particular; (4) the term “lady breast” potential any ingredient of the female breast below the best of the areola; and (5) the term “below circumstances wherein that particular has a sensible expectation of privateness” potential— (A) circumstances wherein a sensible individual would have self belief that he or she could disrobe in privateness, without annoying that a picture of a private component to the guy became being captured; or (B) circumstances wherein a sensible individual would have self belief that a private component to the guy does no longer be seen to the popular public, in spite of no remember if that individual is in a public or inner maximum place. "Is it okay to take pictures of somebody without them understanding?" Definatly no longer particularly helpful. risky below regulation given the circumstances above... riskier nonetheless below any circumstances if being a voyeur will become public understanding, exceedingly if the concern has dependable acquaintances and relatives. i'd take harsh offense at somebody for much less if it in touch my relatives or acquaintances - does no longer you? maximum suitable you utilize your ideas's eye and memory - pick discretion rather of valour :)